To be labelled a "work of Art", a painting, sculpture or other art form should display certain qualities that are unique. However, over the past century there has been a decline in the quality of prize-winning artwork and it is now possible for quite ordinary pieces of art to be labelled "masterpieces" whilst true works of art pass unnoticed. Do you agree or disagree? Give me you reasons. Thanks.
2006-10-08 02:55:56 · 5 answers · asked by Dorothy G 1 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
Why is this in psychology?
Because art can make people think, react and also do the head in.
Is something you've created not getting the attention you think it deserves? Pass unnoticed? What constitutes a "true" work of art?
However much time, thought and effort a person puts into creating a thing there is no specific formula that can guarantee appreciation and/or understanding from an audience (even of 1.)
Make it because you want to. Enjoy it because you do.
2006-10-08 03:19:16 · answer #1 · answered by kittyfreek 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
well coming from a musical background i can understand what your saying? But it's all in how the you interpret the word "work of art". See to me it means exactly what it says just a work of art exp. "piece of art" Now on to your true question "it is now possible for quite ordinary pieces of art to be labelled "masterpieces" whilst true works of art pass unnoticed" and while that is true from my studies it has always been that way. think back.....no true master piece was truly appreciated untill sometime later while the present works from that time are forgotten by now. so in my opinion i agree but i also believe its truly a great piece then it will stand the test of time and be truly appreciated eventually.
2006-10-08 10:31:44 · answer #2 · answered by slab_rider45 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well art can be functional even if it's for aesthetic use; after the wheel was invented, they didn't frame it and never make another one.
I think it depends on what is interesting or masterful to the most number of people at the time, since art is no longer only enjoyed by aristocracy
2006-10-08 10:08:11 · answer #3 · answered by isis 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. Reasons : Media hype and technological advancement. It's now so easy to create "works of art" and media is so quick to label them "masterpieces" for commercial purposes. However, true masterpieces will, in time, come to be recognized and appreciated.
2006-10-08 10:17:08 · answer #4 · answered by DAX 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why is this in Psychology?
2006-10-08 09:58:41 · answer #5 · answered by Tom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋