The value of skepticism?

Question

Should you treat your inability to asnwer skeptical arguments as merely a philosophical puzzle? Or should you allow that inability to alter how you actually live day to day?

Answer 1

I think I am more than qualified enough to help you here. I do not believe it is merely a puzzle. Skepticism has serious repercussions for our metaphysical views, and subsumed under that, epistemology, ethics, and so on. If by how u live day to day, u mean applying the , I don't think I can ever know, or , no one really knows, answers to everything than that will lead you to a dead end fast. Even David Hume, one of the greatest skeptics said that we need to use inference, which is laiden with inconsitinces and invalid logic, to survive. Keep the hard skepticsim in the classroom or in the books, but make sure that when u want to belive something, you don't just accept it at face value but pass it through a rigorous rational test first.

Answer 2

The inability to answer skeptical arguments alerts us no to jump to conclusions when viewing all kinds of things.
I think people's perception of that inablility does us good because it makes us spend more mental efforts on how to better our view of life. Without it, we regard less of all kinds of things in life and tend to treat the inability to asnwer skeptical arguments as merely a philosophical puzzle.

Answer 3

I wish to propose a doctrine which may, I fear, appear wildly paradoxical and subversive. The doctrine in question is this: that it is undesirable to believe a proposition when there is no ground whatever for supposing it true. I must, of course, admit that if such an opinion became common it would completely transform our social life and our political system; since both are at present faultless, this must weigh against it. I am also aware (what is more serious) that it would tend to diminish the incomes of clairvoyants, bookmakers, bishops, and others who live on the irrational hopes of those who have done nothing to deserve good fortune here or hereafter. In spite of these grave arguments, I maintain that a case can be made out of my paradox, and I shall try to set it forth

Index: Historical Writings (Russell)
(its more & more )

Answer 4

There are many people who are skeptics.You have to weigh as per how you want to handle their arguments.

If the skeptic is your boss or wife, you'll have to find out a smart way of handling the situation, without inspiring them to backfire. If you can't, your life will become miserable.

If the skeptic is your peon or your neighbour's naughty child, your inability to deal with situation won't really harm you.

You should not allow skeptics to navigate your life, by the way of their arguments or their negative actions, when you can't answer them.

Being philosophical does not mean that one should suffer. There is no need to become the Athenian philosopher, Socrates.

Answer 5

A cynic believes in nothing. It can be a mean way to spend one's life unless one's an atheist. A sceptic questions everything. You learn more that way, and it saves you from becoming the victim of those who need fellow believers to reassure them against their own uncertainties. Keep it up.

Answer 6

I fee the two extremely the two. for somebody to stand particular of their faith with out stepping on all human beings's feet is exceedingly noble, in my opinion. yet on a similar time, somebody who's keen to scrutinize their very own ideals and admit flaws is very honorable as properly.

Answer 7

you should do a little of both there is nuthing wrong with a little puzzlement or change