Moon hoax, proof at last?

Question

Many people have posted questions suggesting that the Apollo landings were faked. I have always reponded by pointing out the vapidity of such claims, and directing people to the many excellent sites like Bad Astronomy, which debunk the Fox documentary.
However, I have now come across these pictures, I don't know what to say. Please check them out, and say whether you agree that NASA should just 'fess up now to save further embarassment.?

http://stuffucanuse.com/fake_moon_landings/moon_landings.htm

Answer 1

I suppose I shouldn't be surprised at how many of the straightforward moon-hoax fans did not get the joke. It takes a certain kind of stupidity and mental combativeness to fall for something like the "we didn't really go to the moon" hoax in the face of incontravertable evidence, and, apparently that same kind of blockheadedness makes a person capable of not seeing that those pictures are a joke.

A good joke, by the way. Thanks.

Answer 2

And no one else has ever gone to the moon, in about 40 years. If it is impossible to get there safely, then no one could ever disprove the hoax.

Yes, the shadows, the lack of stars,etc., are big defects in the whole image, and Hollywood is so good at faking things, it could all be a hoax.

Right now, the only way to prove whether we were there or not, is to send another manned exploration. And somehow, no one has done that. Why not?

The bigest problem with concluding it's a hoax, is that it would have taken a LOT of people to participate and perpetrate the fraud. Why haven't any of them leaked the truth out, by now?

Answer 3

Oooh common!
Thats untrue! The pictures are made by some critics for fun.
Observe the pics..... The curvature of the moon can be seen easily. So, is the moon same size of an air baloon? or is that astraunaut so huge like thousand times than the common man?

Answer 4

I'm still not convinced. I think we should go back to the Moon and bring back some Moonchkins for further study. Let's take one of the shuttles with an escape pod inside. A ship within a ship. What a concept huh?

Answer 5

When will people quit with this question it would be possible to fake the pics and the visit to the moon but there would be to many people know it was fake making it impossible to cover up

Answer 6

I wish I were surprised about how many people didn't get this. Well done! I have a theory about why so many want to deny it. It's so that they can feel superior to us mugs who know it's true. The problem, of course, is that they're wrong and their convictions are the result of ignorance not wisdom. Keep fighting ignorance and prejudice!

Answer 7

ok, I watched the completed component. What a team of horsepucky! no longer contained in the least bit confident. before everything, they shop alluding to pictures they never show, and is meant to be partial "data" of assertions made for the little bit of pictures that they do show. As to the poor high quality of the exterior pictures on the moon, those have been taking with an outdoors fixed digital camera that have been over-engineered to stand up to lots, probably with extra thick glass, and in black and white because of the fact coloration replaced into nonetheless fairly new on the time and that they did no longer prefer to risk it breaking down and not getting the shot of Armstrong's descent down the ladder and onto the moon's floor. Shading the residing house windows replaced into no longer finished as a fashion to no longer injury their pretend shot of the Earth, yet to dam the incoming photograph voltaic to permit a sparkling shot of the Earth by using the window. As everybody is familiar with, in case you attempt to work out something outdoors your window at evening, you may show off the interior gentle so which you do no longer see it obvious on the window. to that end the photograph voltaic reflecting off the interior partitions could be an analogous because of the fact the interior gentle. the completed bit with the "crescent formed insert" and the digital camera supposedly being outdoors the pill... ludicrous. If a crescent formed insert replaced into getting used, it could have a of course defined part, which it does not. there is one shot the place they say the plain shape of the Earth is by using the way it quite is being seen by using a thick window, yet while that have been the case, there could be obvious distortion around the face of the earth, and there is no longer. the reality that they furnish 2 diverse motives for why the Earth seems to be no longer "finished", is extremely suspicious by itself. The "0.33 social gathering" asserting "talk" interior the communication replaced into in basic terms a on the spot by undertaking administration to get them to declare something. And the "cryptic assertion" by Armstrong to the pupils on the top, the place he says "we've in basic terms finished the start", is him asserting that Apollo replaced into basically the start of guy's journey to area, and the "undone" area is as much as destiny generations. i could pass on in further element approximately how idiotic this video is, yet i'm drained and that i pass to mattress. Goodnight.

Answer 8

it's a conspiracy, now we have the proof well done, I am gonna start wearing my tin foil hat again to stop them reading my thoughts and programming me from outa space. Dang, them Americans are soooo pesky!

Answer 9

i have studied nasa movies of the space landing(yes im a big nerd)i been studying them for along time i have pictures just like thos(what im about to say is pure genios)go to the link below his messeage on the first page you will see sparks coming out of the bottom the rocket as i know fire cannot exist without air(there is no air in space)so how could that possible happen the laws of physics wouldt allow itbecause of my pure genios thoughts vote for me best answer

Answer 10

The only thing to do, is to send someone to the moon for real(if they didn't the first time) or again and bring back some moon rock and stuff.