English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Consider the business contracts for clothing, vehicles, weapons, food, eyeglasses, medicine, fuels, bandages, tobacco, pencils, computers, socks, soda pop, candy, dental parts, protheics, rubber gloves, cots, tents, armour, binocculars, wrenches, hammers, etc.

2006-10-07 23:15:30 · 1 answers · asked by LeBlanc 6 in News & Events Other - News & Events

Thanx for the site.

2006-10-08 01:21:25 · update #1

Now here is an opportunity for the Common Citizen, We the People to finally get ahead of the game, and you refuse based on trifle things like Life, limb, ethics, morals, and ca$h is on the table for the taking.

2006-10-09 16:34:37 · update #2

1 answers

I think corporations such as Haliburton (but also many others) anticipated that they would make a lot more money "rebuilding" and "modernizing" Iraq. At that time they thought this would consist of owing or running Iraqi state owned businesses that had been privatized; modernizing the infrastructure, and then developing new, American type businesses in Iraq. Instead they have spent their resources on security, which offers no long term profits.

If you haven't seen it, you might be interested in Robert Greenwald's new movie, Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers. The website below tells a lot about it!

2006-10-07 23:54:58 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers