Is this true that George w Bush has commented that U.S. will attack Iran anyway?

Question

and it doesn't matter if Iran stop it's nuclear activities or not? and U.S. will change the current rejim in Iran?

Answer 1

There's no way in hell the US can attack Iran. Even if Bush wanted to, we have over a hundred thousand troops bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan. Bush is looking to resolve this diplomatically with sanctions, but China and Russia are in bed with Iran so we're basically stuck between a rock and, well you know what...

If, the US invaded Iran, we'd most likely invade from two directions, from the east (Afghanistan) and west (Iraq) since our troops are already over there...sounds pretty good, but have you seen the size of Iran...it's massive. A ground invasion would be folly.

Even if we attacked Iran with all kinds of munitions greater than shock and awe, the results would be hum ho at best. Iran has cleverly built it's nuclear facilities around heavily populated areas which would result in massive collateral damage. They've also hidden a lot of their facilities underground, and the US military has no idea if bunker busters would even make a dent, and to start with, US intelligence doesn't know every location. Bottomline, airstrikes would simply delay the inevitable.

The Iran situation isn't something to be taken lightly.

Answer 2

GW Bush is an idiot and we need to get rid of him now sooner than later. (I am a pacifist.)
But the Iranian president has all but said that he intends to 'wipe Israel off the map' once he gets enough nukes.
So to prevent the genocide of a people (Again!) and prevent the use of nuclear weapons, I can see that the governments of the world would and should together act to use force to save millions of lives.
Iran must acknowledge that all nations now existing have a right to exist and extend freedom and human rights to every person.
They must apologize for their clear and present threat to commit nuclear genocide upon another people.
A condition of Mutual Assured Destruction must exist between the United States and Iran from this time forth until there is a 'second' Iranian revolution and Religious Terrorism is overthrown just as Communism was before them.
Liberty, Human Rights, and Equality must be extended to every person.

Answer 3

I don't believe that but I wish it was true. We need to get on with it. They have clearly annouced their intentions to wipe us out. I say we do unto them before they can do unto us.

A state of War exist between the U.S. and Iran. They are supporting the people that our killing our troops in the field right now. That is an act of war we don't need any other reason to:

Nuke Iran, Now.

Answer 4

I haven't heard about that, but the U. S. A. already lacks soldiers because of Afghanistan and Iraq, even in Afghanistan is taken over by NATO. So my prediction is no, unless they just want to bomb the country.
Bush's policy about spreading democracy in the Middle East failed, and probably his successor will create a new strategy.

Answer 5

it is not OIL but the OIL Companies that want Iran to be in their pocket. they want total control.
President of the country is a mouthpiece of Business Coommunity and as such they will like to grab Iran at any cost.

Answer 6

i don't like Bush, I not in any respect have. he's his daddy's puppet. Gotta make up for the embarrassment some how!!! i imagine Bush supplies us and Congress the finger each and every time he makes a range. He hasn't discovered to quit and imagine earlier he does some thing. the challenge with maximum of our Presidents (Rep and Dem) is that the election of the President is now no longer a through the individuals for the individuals election. We proved that when Bush develop into positioned into place of work even even with the actuality that Gore were given the conventional vote....bypass figure!!! the challenge about that's, we should not be at liberty with any president. maximum folk do not get it, there truly are belongings you have to be prepared to provide up as a fashion to get what you truly favor. you understand who i'd solid a vote for? all and sundry that would want to face up there and really say to me. "i don't understand for particular what i visit do. i visit do my perfect to do what's perfect for OUR united states. i visit concentration on the needs of our united states, fairly of irritating about topics outdoors of our united states. even as and if our united states is threatened i visit pay interest to ALL of my advisors and make the perfect determination i visit. Its going to be a lengthy confusing highway, and a number of you would possibly want to unlike me in the right, yet i visit do the perfect i visit for our united states to make it a good united states with a reason to be proud again." it quite is the guy who receives my vote. good job on reporting Who. Its no longer that he disagreed with you, its that he made hate/racist (commy) threats directed immediately at you. there's a distinction between disagreeing with someone and making such hate feedback. possibly Who isn't as take care of in his opinion of Bush as what he thinks he's! He needs to detect innovations on the thanks to no longer take "wondering G Dubyah" as this kind of own attack and detect a fashion to intelligently and flippantly teach his opinion. thanks for helping the right habit in those forums through reporting those who look to ignore the regulations.

Answer 7

George W Bush deserves to die. I expect they will, i mean, is part of it all for oil? Damn america...well, damn the US government. Why cant they just leave the rest of the world alone?

Answer 8

That idiot bush will now say there are weapons of mass destruction in N Korea and Iran

Goshh...we have WORLD WAR III round the corner...jesus christ...someone please stop this idiotttttt

Answer 9

Well, he's dying to have a go at them anyway, so why not. Mind you, he's such a prat that he'll probably miss anyway !

Answer 10

Ok