English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does this mean that the horoscopes are thrown into dissarray (how the hell do you spell that last word?)?

2006-10-07 22:09:52 · 16 answers · asked by stress-'ead 3 in Entertainment & Music Horoscopes

Traynor, saw it on telly a few weeks ago, about 3 new planets found in our galaxy but one too small to be counted. No it wasn't April 1st. Have not heard anything more about it, so no more details sorry.

2006-10-07 22:16:51 · update #1

16 answers

according to purist astrologers, there are tweleve planets ruling the twelve signs and two of them- vulcan (for virgo) and pan-horus(for taurus) have yet to be discovered. it is only after these two planets have been discovered and documented by man that these two sunsigns will bestow their full effects on the characters of ppl born under them. that's why taurus shares venus with libra and virgo has to share mercury with gemini. isn't it cool that astrologers already knew about these planets? also note that for man, only those things affect him which are known to him.
now, about your question- don't worry, these new planets which could have been pan-horus and vulcan are not those planets after all, and so will have no affect on astrology.(scientists should read a bit of astrology before giving super stupid cocky names to new planets). they are not considered by astrologers to be of any value.
similarly as whatever the scientists might say, astrology will always consider pluto to be a planet and pluto will always rule scorpio.
come to think of it, even sun and moon are considered to be planets in astrology, though those (moronic) scientists may call them stars or satellites or whatever.
therefore, what a bunch of nerds keep naming newly found rocks in a desperate attempt to highlight their mostly boring careers DOES NOT and WILL NOT affect your destiny, or lessen the power of the planets of astrology. relax.
oh, and by the way, it's spelled as DISARRAY.
CHEERS!!!

2006-10-07 23:30:08 · answer #1 · answered by thehelper 3 · 0 1

ok let me just say this about astrology ok. Every star in astrology is accounted for sweetheart, at the time they may have counted them as a star instead of a planet, give them a little credit ok. And anywho, pluto never had his own zodiac sign that I'm aware of, I think he shared his with others. Even though poor Pluto has been knocked down in the ranks of planets to being called a planetoid, he still effects the astrology charts and he will still be on them, sorry if that bugs you but its true, there are other planetoids that affect the charts and they are still listed there too. So don't worry about the astrologiers, they are coping with the changes in science very nicely.

2006-10-08 06:45:58 · answer #2 · answered by LunaFaye 4 · 0 0

If they are further away than pluto, then it won't be interperated for you personally anyway, what i mean is, the planet is going to take so long to travel round the sun that it will affect us as a planet, not individually. Also, its not going to interfer with the planets we've discovered so far, only that astrologers are going to have to figure out the new planets' affect on us. The actual starsigns will always stay the same, cause they're all just a section of the sky as we see it, if that makes any sense.

2006-10-08 11:15:12 · answer #3 · answered by Meggi 2 · 0 0

There are likely to be many, many more planets in our galaxy. Those outside our solar system are too far away to exert much influence on anything here. Any dwarf planets we discover in our own solar system are likely to be too small to have an effect as well. I wouldn't worry about it at all. I don't actually believe in astrology but if it has been accurate for you in the past, it will still be good in the future.

2006-10-08 06:41:30 · answer #4 · answered by Kuji 7 · 0 0

Astrology never worked anyway so I wouldn't worry too much about it (unless you made a big decision based on it).

Even since Galielo discovered the moons of Jupiter similar questions have been asked as what you've asked. The only answer that makes sense is that the horroscope was bogus all alone (look up Forer effect sometime if you want to know how they really work).

2006-10-08 05:25:07 · answer #5 · answered by bestonnet_00 7 · 0 0

While scientifically never proof of couple of new planets then we must never do any actiities because they can do the bad effect also presently no body know either that is planets or some thing else tht is not scientificaly prooved still

2006-10-09 03:11:22 · answer #6 · answered by name of spritual tantra horr0r 3 · 0 0

I just posted a question in Mythology & folklore about Eris, formerly known as Xena. (Unfortunately, nobody gets it.)

I don't think actual influences will change; the planets have always been there. The interpretation of said influences, however, will quite possibly change. I'm curious to see how much influence astrologers will attribute to the new planet names and their ancient namesakes...Eris, currently residing in Cetus, is giving us two big gobs of chaos in that respect.

2006-10-08 05:21:12 · answer #7 · answered by angk 6 · 0 0

That's a good point. I'm afraid that I don't know the answer to it but I bet they try to sell parts of them off soon like they did with the moon. Who decides who owns these planets anyway

2006-10-08 05:15:51 · answer #8 · answered by tiz 3 · 0 0

They are made up anyway so a few more planets wont make much of a difference

2006-10-08 05:52:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

not sure,but,the monthly calendar isn't true anyway,something to do with millions of years ago,I believe there should have only been ten months to a year not twelve,so I guess horoscopes are already in disarray..

2006-10-08 08:08:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers