Why do miserable parents stay married just for the kid's sake?

Question

Wouldn't it be better to raise a child with one happy parent than two parents who fight all the time?

Answer 1

I think it horrible for miserable parents to stay together, I am now finishing my divorce this week in which I filed for the kids sake!!! My husband was mentally abusive to the children and I and it affected the children to where they needed phsycological help. Though they never admitted it, I saw change in both of my young ones and what I thought was a few drops of rain in their lives was actually a complete iceburg. My theory is this...if you feel you can be a better parent than you are right now to your children by being alone, then you need to do that. You cannot give them your all when you are busy fighting and "coping". You are also teaching them not to be strong and to become an abuser with words or actions as they , themselves start relationships. It was the best decision of my life to get the crp out of it and have a healthy home.

Answer 2

Maybe, if two parents agree to stay together for the kids sake, then the parents need to agree to not fight infront of the kids, for the kids sake. My godparent's did this for their kids and told no one, not even their kids, until my cousins were all grown up, did they anounce they were getting a divornce. Know one knew. It is important for parents to stay married for the kids sake because kids still need to develope, where the adults have already gone through development. Plus, in itself it will be a lesson for the kids, that no matter what, a relationship is hard work, and maybe they'll follow that example when they get older, you don't just quit when the going gets tough, relationships take work, weather the couple loves each other or not. I hope I helped you. GOOD LUCK!!!

Answer 3

What bigger "sake" is there if not for a kid who didn't ask to be born and can't control what they do?
Would it be better for the so-called adults to grow the eff up, stop fighting and learn to get along better than kindergarten kids? I mean- is acting like a decent human being to the person you chose to marry so freaking difficult????
Wouldn't it be better to teach the kid how to resolve conflict and keep a family intact than to keep fighting all the time? Is that so hard to do these days? Are the parents so lame and stupid that they can't even be normal to each other?

Answer 4

I agree totally with your statement.
I think, because of guilt, parents remain together for the child. They do not want to traumatize their children by splitting up, not realizing that the tension between them is already doing that.
It is ridiculous, and see people who stay together for their kids all the time, and though they mean well, they are not creating a good environment for their children. Instead, they are building a family relationships based on false pretenses and deception.

Answer 5

For some, the cultural pressure to stay married may not allow them to seriously entertain the idea of divorce. This may especially be the case in families with strong religious backgrounds. Therefore they assume without questioning that it is in the best interests of the children to stay married.

Answer 6

If the mothers and fathers think of that they have got even a glimmer of desire of saving their marriage then they should attempt to artwork issues out first. whether they do divorce they should at 'tutor' their babies that they did a minimum of make an effort to proceed to be together. (counselling) this is not any use telling them that 'mummy and daddy tried in spite of the fact that it did not artwork out'. babies are very perceptive, they understand whether or not you worked at it or not. in spite of the fact that, ultimate in a marriage that has misplaced each and every of the characteristics of a loving and supportive dating does the babies no stable. do not newborn yourselves that the babies would be extra valuable off with the mothers and fathers divorced. they're going to go through. only as they're going to go through in a house with 2 egocentric adults who only can not get alongside! bear in recommendations, babies blame themselves for his or her ascertain's issues. They see a divorce as their fault and that they see continual arguements as their fault. If there is consistent conflict in the domicile, or a divorce, it is going to become the ascertain's first precedence to get their newborn's happiness decrease back! Enlist the help of an outdoors expert if want be. to completely answer your question. i don't think of that extra mothers and fathers ought to stay married for the sake of the babies, i think of that; extra mothers and fathers ought to artwork harder AT MAKING THEIR dating artwork FOR THE SAKE OF the babies! Your strikes shape your babies's destiny! stable success!

Answer 7

YES. I had to watch my parent's marriage deteriorate for years and I was just trying to convice myself that the inevitable wouldn't occur. It stole years from my childhood. I'm happier now that the tension is gone. Listen to the song "Stay Together for the Kids" by Blink 182. It rings very true, to me anyway.

Answer 8

No, it is important for the child to have both parents as much as possible, until he/she is grown. Also, who knows when the parents will wake up and see their own selfishness and do their part to get along.

Answer 9

Some parents,don't agree,don't care too much,don't really love but they manage not to fight in front of their children ,compromise,have respect for one another in order to keep their family together.If mom and dad can do that,the children will be happy.It's all about having some controll for your children

Answer 10

well if yo fight thats not healthy but if you stay misserable quietly then so be it. we stay together to show or kids stability. a divorce can be just as devistating to a child as death. we say we would do anything for our kids and some times that means happiness.