Why ? why not ? explain
2006-10-07 17:15:25 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Bill Clinton, I am 60 years old and I have never seen the government run in such an efficent manor. Anybody that wanted a job had one. The tax rate was low for the poor and middle class and he left with a budget surplus. This with a hostile repuglican congress for much of his term in office. Great job Bill.
2006-10-07 17:28:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I choose Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He's a great president because he held "Fireside Chats" on the radio to lift Americans' spirits in a trying time during the Depression. His New Deal policies have given millions of the unemployed jobs. When World War II began, he mobilized the nation to fight against tyranny led by Germany and Japan. He died just as WWII was nearing its climax in the spring of '45.
2006-10-07 18:17:39 · answer #2 · answered by brian 2010 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Elvis Presley
2006-10-08 16:58:33 · answer #3 · answered by Devil May Cry 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is only one The President of the United States of America: the rock band!
(not enough music you said?)
2006-10-07 19:32:14 · answer #4 · answered by kesatria 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My known, in spite of his rules, is Teddy Roosevelt. He replaced into thoroughly hardcore, each of ways by utilising. (He gave a ninety-minute speech after being shot, between many distinctive suggestions-blowing acts.) His cousin FDR is my known on a coverage factor. the only subject with the warm Deal replaced into that it did no longer bypass a procedures sufficient, leaving the fundamental massive inflow of state intervention indoors the financial device again returned indoors one between those a international conflict. Buchanan replaced into only undesirable, as he thoroughly did no longer do something to stay sparkling of or perhaps mitigate the appearance Civil conflict. Reagan is hyped as much as a criminal degree, rather on circumstance that the his meant ending of the chilly conflict replaced into plenty extra beneficial by utilising Gorbachev's strikes. the fewer suggested approximately Bush the 2d, the extra beneficial useful.
2016-12-26 12:27:44 · answer #5 · answered by santolucito 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
J.F.K.
Because when he was president Amreica was a proud and upstanding nation.
He stood up to Castro and gave Castro 48 hours to turn their missiles away from America and guess what.
Castro did!
The world listened to J.F.K.
He was an honest man that truly cared for the working class and the underpriveledged.
Richard Nixon paid to have him assassinated.
2006-10-07 17:26:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Clinton, he was good. Things seemed to be running smoothly when he was president.
Who cares that he was getting blows while he was in office!? He was the PRESIDENT!!! Hes got to have some perks! No but on the reals, Im sure all the presidents get their nookie here and there, its just that he got caught, oh well, i dont know why people got all huffy about it and decided hes not a good president just because of that
2006-10-07 17:24:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Clinton - he and his wife did an excellent job, the country was at one of it's highest points...... sure there were a few problems when he was president but they were taken care of effectively. He was a good guy, that whole thing with Monica was blown out of proportion, because he was the only US president to cheat on his wife (hardly). I liked his wife too, she was real, she didn't have a smile plastered on her face, she got in there and got her hands dirty.
2006-10-07 17:34:49 · answer #8 · answered by katjha2005 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
John F. Kenendy, the right person for a trying time. Open people eyes.
I still like to know who killed him, his brother and Martin l. King.
Many think the mob was hired by the CIA
2006-10-07 17:29:24 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ronald Wilson Reagan.
2006-10-07 17:22:48 · answer #10 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋