First, your definitions. I will assume that you mean indestructible.
Nothing is indestructible. From a subatomic particle, to a black hole, anything in nature or created by man is can be destroyed. However, in thought questions, it is allowable to grant properties to objects that they do not normally have, AS LONG AS IT IS CONSISTENT WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE THOUGHT QUESTION!
The same thing is true about unmovable and unstoppable, and there lies the problem.
If we stipulate that something is unmovable, then we can’t have something that is unstoppable and vice-versa.
So, your question does not make any sense.
2006-10-07 17:35:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Walking Man 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
This exact question was posed in an issue of Wizard, the comic book magazine, about 10 years ago. I stopped reading comics a long time ago, so I don't know how I remember this one little thing from the magazine.
The character Juggernaut is unstoppable, and the character The Blob, is unmoveable. A letter to the editor asked what would happen if Juggernaut ran into the Blob. They decided that Juggernaut would be stopped and the Blob would move.
2006-10-08 00:17:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by stevejensen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unstopable object will probably bounce back or deflected off or somethin and unmovable just sit there. Where's my rolly pop?
2006-10-08 02:26:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
UNMOVEABLE still remainin its place. UNSTOPABLE will bounce and move REVERSE
2006-10-08 01:51:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by safrodin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
they would create offspring. the offspring would also collide and reproduce. then you would have an exact replica of george w bushes brain.
2006-10-08 00:22:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by chris l 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
They explode because "undistructible" is not a word.
2006-10-08 00:16:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they could bounce. since each of these variables are impossible there is no rule for it.
2006-10-08 00:55:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by ui6fu6yujt c 2
·
0⤊
0⤋