English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

As a person casts off worn out clothes and takes on new ones, even so the Self discards worn out bodies and enters into new ones.

Even as a person throws away his old clothes and dons new ones, so the Lord of intelligence takes on another body.

Any thoughts from ur side ?

2006-10-07 15:48:01 · 8 answers · asked by jayakrishnamenon 3 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

8 answers

Here are a few words from the Tibetan on the subject. They may be of interest to you.

"It is interesting to note that practically all the teaching given anent rebirth or reincarnation has emphasized the material phenomenal side though there has always been a more or less casual reference to the spiritual and mental gains acquired in the school of life upon this planet, from incarnation to incarnation. The true nature of the unfolding awareness and the growth in the inner consciousness of the true man have been little noted; the gain of each life in added grasp of the mechanism of contact, and the result of increased sensitivity to the environment (which are the only values with which the self concerns itself), are seldom, if ever, stressed. Details of living conditions, statements about possible material situations, descriptions of places, clothes, and of personality human relations are imaginatively displayed, and the "recovery of past incarnations" has usually been the so-called recovery of dramatic episodes which feed the innate sense of individuality of the reincarnating man, and usually feed his vanity as well. This curious presentation has been due to several things. First of all, to the fact that the world of illusion is the dominating factor as yet in the lives of the best of men; secondly, that the point in evolution has been such that the writer or speaker has not been able to view the life cycle from the angle of the soul, detached and undeluded, for had he done so, the material phenomenal descriptions would have been omitted and probably not even perceived, and only the values - spiritual and mental - and those matters which concern the group interior life would have been emphasized. The methods used to present this age-old doctrine of rebirth, and the false emphasis laid upon the form aspect to the exclusion of the soul values, have brought about a bad reaction to the whole subject in the minds of intelligent people and of the scientific investigator. Yet, in spite of this, real good has been accomplished, for the whole theory has been seeping steadily into the racial consciousness, becoming an integral part of it and, therefore, moving on to popular and finally scientific recognition."

2006-10-07 16:27:24 · answer #1 · answered by CosmicKiss 6 · 1 0

"flesh and blood" will possibly no longer enter into God's kingdom, yet "flesh and bone" can and could. Resurrection is the reuniting of the spirit with the physique in an immortal state, no longer concern to ailment or death. while the resurrected Lord appeared to His Apostles, He helped them understand that He had a physique of flesh and bones. He suggested, "Behold my palms and my ft, that it is i myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath no longer flesh and bones, as ye see me have" Resurrection is the inseparable reunion of the spirit with an immortal, glorified actual physique. The physique laid interior the grave is mortal; the resurrected actual physique is immortal. There are allusions to the belief of resurrection interior the old testomony. as nicely, the resurrection of Jesus Christ, because of the fact the prototype of all resurrections, is a crucial and demanding message of the hot testomony: "i'm the resurrection and the existence" (John 11:25). identity and character follow the spirit, and after the resurrection, the spirit will stay perpetually in a actual physique. in assessment to Platonism and gnosticism, the scriptures coach that the actual physique is a step upward interior the form and perfection of all. The physique is sacred and could be recognized as a temple (a million Cor. 3:sixteen). because of the fact resurrection is as common as death, all could die and all could be resurrected. it quite is a unfastened present to all adult men, yet no longer all would be resurrected on an analogous 2nd. The resurrected physique will additionally be ideal to the circumstances and glory to which the guy is assigned interior the day of judgment.

2016-10-15 23:12:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Instant by instant we dissolve & arise anew;
dying with each out breath, reviving with the in breath.

This grasping at a Self that transends death is not supportable by the evidence of how we exist while we are alive. It's not only rebirth you are referring to, but the Self itself that is also imaginary.

;-)

2006-10-07 17:58:02 · answer #3 · answered by WikiJo 6 · 1 0

Self can only remain Self as long as it is under the same certain circumstances as it was conditioned. if Self transforms/evolves/mutates, it can no longer remain Self.....

2006-10-07 15:56:08 · answer #4 · answered by shatzy 3 · 1 0

striving for spiritual progress......? the renewing of the mind?the feeding of the body and soul?

2006-10-07 16:09:21 · answer #5 · answered by lotusdell 4 · 1 0

i know i tryed nowing the question but its a dicory for no one to see i bet

2006-10-07 15:50:57 · answer #6 · answered by camper h 1 · 1 0

someone had criticized or mimic its style, that it realized/reflected it self, now its an original one

2006-10-07 15:52:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

i think i'd like to try some of that stuff you're smoking.

2006-10-07 15:55:27 · answer #8 · answered by R J 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers