I understand that two weeks they can let you go. But for 30 day notice they have to either give you severance pay or unemployment, correct?
2006-10-07 15:26:53 · 5 answers · asked by Angela 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Careers & Employment
Nope, Kansas is too you are eligible for unemployment but not unless you are fired, which hey can do at any time
2006-10-07 15:35:10 · answer #1 · answered by megs 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As to getting severance or unemployment, not necessarily, if they fire you for cause. And yes, they can fire you within your 30 days. If you've quit, even with a later date specified, you might or might not be eligible for unemployment comp.
2006-10-07 15:36:31 · answer #2 · answered by Judy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is not something interior the form approximately Inspectors wide-unfold. the situation is a advent of Congress and is meant to be apolitical. in the previous the President can hearth, he's meant to video reveal a 30 day cooling off era and notify. to that end, the misconduct became having the unmitigated gall to take data of misuse of public money the Assistant attorney wide-unfold for the district. The AG desperate to not prosecute however the offending company gave lower back 50% of the money. the incontrovertible fact that the founder and COO of the corporate became a movie star supporter of the President of direction has not something to do with it..
2016-11-26 23:58:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right-to-work laws are statutes enforced in several U.S. States, allowed under provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act, which prohibit trade unions from making membership a condition of employment, either before or after hire. Opponents contend that the name right-to-work law is misleading because such laws do not guarantee employment to anyone. On the contrary, they maintain that such laws tend to reduce workers' job security by weakening the bargaining power of unions.
In the U.S., any state law forbidding various union-security measures, particularly the union shop, under which workers are required to join a union within a specified time after they begin employment. Supporters of such laws maintain that they are more equitable because they allow a person to choose whether or not to join a labour union.
SOURCES: http://www.answers.com/topic/right-to-work-laws
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-work_law
2006-10-07 15:59:44 · answer #4 · answered by Planet Progress 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is no reason why a person should get paid becuas they where stupid and got themself fired.
2006-10-07 17:09:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋