I thought the GOP was supposed to be about family values.
2006-10-07 15:13:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
What you didn't know is that the Republican "family value" initiative is about destroying families. They've taken away social programs for women and children, reduced the middle class so that rich can get richer from wars that husbands have to leave their families to fight and they're responsible for many kids dying in these wars. They've usurped all of the federal monies for education and health and they want to damage the minds of young teenage pages by not putting a stop to sexual harrassment by party members and only Heaven Knows what happened to all the kids that went missing in Jeb Bush's Florida.
Of course, the Republican's sympathizing supporters don't want you to realize any of this. Like a kid saying the dog ate his homework, the Republicans are saying the Democrats did it all.
Write to other websites and suggest that computer experts scrutinize and monitor those rigged voting machines owned by Republicans before they claim another election win.
2006-10-07 15:25:05 · answer #1 · answered by Reba K 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This question will just bring out the Repuke hate gang, led by Rush Limbaugh. You will get some of their real family values in their answers. They are unable to think for themselves so they will use some of Rush's stuff to answer in a perfectly obscene way. They have no family values, after all they voted not once but twice for a coke snorting, alcoholic with no morals that started a war based on a lie.
2006-10-07 15:21:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hey, nepotism is fine, as long as it's kept all in the family. But seriously, why trust ANY politician? Republicans, Democrats... just titles. They're all a bunch of self-serving lying bureaucrats trying to fund their pet projects with our money!
2006-10-07 15:22:58 · answer #3 · answered by C-Man 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
in the event that they do, they should take an prolonged confusing look in the mirror and comprehend it ain't properly worth it. NeoCons have taken the occasion. vote casting for Obama may be only as undesirable (if not worse) in case you declare to be a conservative. they are able to punish by making use of not vote casting for the Republican--different than that, they are able to looking whichever candidate suits their perspectives maximum. subsequently that could in all possibility be Chuck 1st earl baldwin of bewdley or Bob Barr. third occasion '08
2016-10-19 00:12:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because I cant trust the surrender monkeys in the dhimmicratic party to handle the war on terrorism.
2006-10-07 15:15:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because then we'd have to trust the Dems. I like it better when both parties are paralyzed fighting each other, and stay out of my business.
2006-10-07 15:17:20 · answer #6 · answered by Jim P 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, you did ask your question very respectfully and I appreciate that. I'm not sure who knew what when and who didn't. I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt at the moment but I'm skeptical as well.
2006-10-07 15:19:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't trust GOP.
2006-10-07 15:22:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
gee...you makes alot sense...so if you lied about one thing...no one should ever trust you again...what a narrow mind you have...we do believe in family values...and one of those values is the ability to forgive...
2006-10-07 15:17:00 · answer #9 · answered by turntable 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Politicians are many things. "Trustworthy" is not on the list. Proceed accordingly . . .
2006-10-07 15:24:29 · answer #10 · answered by szydkids 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋