Reporting for duty.
But must admit I'm voting for the lesser of two evils. BUT then again, I honestly believe two things:
1. With Kerry or Gore we would not be in Iraq creating new terrorists by the thousands and killing Americans to do it.
2. And we would not be using torture chambers to fight people who used torture chambers.
2006-10-08 18:44:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lisa M 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The way to do that is to undermine their control over the rigged voting machines. The best computer experts in the world should be called in weeks before the election to scrutinize the machines and then be on hand the night of the elections.
Some vote machine advocacy groups tried this during the last presidential election but only on a tiny scale. This should be an all out massive effort undertaken by every US town to insure that exit tallies are taken as people walk out of the polls, and then bi-partisan computer and vote experts should be on hand after the polls close and in places where the Republicans used to be alone and with their friends counting the vote for decades.
Please work to get the message out, even if you only cut and paste this into other webgroups. Get going!
2006-10-07 14:25:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Reba K 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well look at the bigger picture; we almost impeached a president for far less, we have become so pathetically passive and weak. We have lost our national will to stand up for whats right, we dont even whine anymore. Makes me want to puke. Land of the free, home of the brave? not even - puke bucket !!!! Bunch of finger pointing, paranoid, cowardly bullies! No nukes for Iraq or North Korea but we will be very freindly to China? Only cause we wouldnt stand a chance at fighting them. So we fret and prance about North Korea and Iran to what? Fill the voters with fear for more pork barrel budgets under the lie of security. Anyone willing to sacrifice freedom for security deserves neither.
2006-10-07 14:30:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by metalsoft@sbcglobal.net 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
I would throw them out of office, but I fear the alternatives would be much, much worse.
I'm not being silly with this answer, either. I really don't think that the Republicans have done all they could've during these past 6 years. However, I really, really really don't want Democrats in power and I don't know if I can trust any third-party candidates. The Republicans represent my values most, even if a few of them fall far short of that.
2006-10-07 14:19:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Eric C 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
Democrats are much worse at leading, if they had been in charge after 9/11 America would be fighting the current war in America, because the libs don't have the guts to do what needs to be done. So you whining no-brains can shut up and leave if you don't like it.
2006-10-07 14:16:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by letitcountry 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Look i understand that you are angry but as a citizen and a woman I feel like you are noone to to say who can lead or not. And you are also noone to judge who is pathetic or not. We are not here to judge and complain, we need to take action. And if people only actually had the guts to stand up and not be satisfied our country would be very different. I think Bush needs to get out of office. He has done nothing to help us, and if he has tried noone seems to see any of it.
2006-10-07 14:15:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by diana li 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Bush is doing a great job of leading.
This is more of the same. You lieberals have no plan of any kind, no economic platform except a 1935 emergency plan during the Great Depression. No plan for dealing with terrorism except more of Clinton's ignore - them - and -they'll - go away plan.
So, all you can do is bash Republicans with your potty mouth insults.
Give people a reason to vote for your guys other than Republicans are bad.
2006-10-07 14:14:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by retiredslashescaped1 5
·
3⤊
3⤋
While I do not like where our leadership has gone there is very little difference in the parties @ this point in history. Had Al Gore or Viet Cong Kerry won the election I do fear our current battles would not be happening, instead we would have faced more terrorist actions.
2006-10-07 14:31:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Now that's a hasty accusation. Nobody that's functioning is that bad. Incompetent perhaps and replaced perhaps. AND it looks like some will be.
2006-10-07 14:16:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by longroad 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
This ad was paid for by George Sorose, Osama BinLadin and friends of Al Quida.
2006-10-07 14:17:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋