2006-10-07 13:16:03 · 13 answers · asked by Chris M 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I think life with no answers. At least you would always live in hope of eventually finding some; it would give you something to do. Life with no questions would be pretty boring.
2006-10-07 13:19:49 · answer #1 · answered by The Gadfly 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Good question! I would say neither but if I had to choose one then I'd rather have no answers than no questions. I have many questions left unanswered & unanswerable but that's what makes life interesting. The mystery. So much more to know. If there were no questions it would mean that I wasn't even interested enough to ask anything, that I didn't want to learn, know or grow more. Or it would mean that we had all the answers & there was nothing left to ask. That would be a bleak, boring existence.
But for the purposes of Yahoo answers I prefer answering to asking! Tee hee
2006-10-07 20:49:53 · answer #2 · answered by amp 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I ask a million questions every day, yet i have no answers. So the one with no answers is my pick. And anyways, just asking the questions helps you understand everything better.
2006-10-07 21:12:34 · answer #3 · answered by Freaked out 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Person with no questions has to be either genius or dump. But person with no answers can be mean either he is enlightened that he is not bothered about the qustion itself or he is dump. In either case you can leave people guessing what r u? The problem is when we question or answer it will definitely reveal what we are.
2006-10-08 05:59:25 · answer #4 · answered by vlikeme 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A Buddhist would probably say it is preferable to have no questions. This would mean you accept everything as it is.
To have questions, but no answers, is to suffer.
Great question - LOL!
2006-10-07 20:24:43 · answer #5 · answered by penny4yourthoughts 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. If one does not question, one does not get answers. If one has no answers, one has not sought enlightenment through questioning...
Questions and Answers are yin&yang. One cannot exist without the other
2006-10-07 20:29:02 · answer #6 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One with no answers; that is the preferable state. It is the question that drives us; to paraphrase.
2006-10-07 20:19:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Seeking and longing are the primary ingrediants of suffering...they are also the characteristics of one who questions their surroundings.
2006-10-07 20:25:52 · answer #8 · answered by 15fsg546rge1rrheljh45hjr90459ty3 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To question is to grow. Toonly have the answers is arrogance. To have neither is to stagnate.
2006-10-07 23:53:49 · answer #9 · answered by Marcia B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One with no questions for that would require all the answers.
No matter how thin you slice it there are always two sides.
2006-10-07 20:36:53 · answer #10 · answered by Tommy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋