English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Our poor kids are dying on our streets...but omg...the liberals are more concerned with the war than our kids. Oh, and all the school shootings...I just wish they would protest against that, instead of our freedom. Liberals are more concerned with overseas affairs than what is happening in their own cities.

2006-10-07 12:42:05 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

20 answers

Well it would be nice to lure gang members and lib-tards into a free fire zone and test out the latest weapons systems for efficacy...

Lib-tards and gang members are a parasitic drag on our society, our economy, and our basic values since those two groups obviously exhibit no values of their own...

Lib-tards aren't really concerned about anything but themselves.... Its their collective flapping lips blathering on and on repeating the same old tired mantras of the proudly clueless...

They yammer on thinking they have some idea of what they are talking about but their collective grip on reality is tenuous at best...

2006-10-07 12:56:31 · answer #1 · answered by juandos 3 · 0 3

I don't see conservatives doing a lick about it either and last time I checked it's the conservatives that are all about fighting them there instead of here.

I personally think the Central American gang problem is all about fighting them here and we'd better get a little more serious about that.

2006-10-07 20:04:39 · answer #2 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 2 0

Um, sorry, lieberals 0, Cons 1.

Foley did not molest any kids. That was the Democrats when they were in power. The page involved with Foley was 18 years old. Let me repeat that -- he was an adult!!!! So, please stop the lying.

Also, let me point out there was no sex involved with that adult page.

Now, let us look at the Democrats when they were in power.

A Democrat named Studds got two 17 year olds, legal minors, drunk, and buggered them. They said it was not voluntary, but the Dem ethics committee decided they were not reliable witnesses, so Studds only got censured. When he returned to the floor, he got a standing ovation from his fellow Democrats.

A man named Mel Reynolds, also a Democrat, had sex with a 16 year old girl. He was convicted and received a long prison sentence. BILL CLINTON PARDONED HIM!!!!!!!!!

Then, there was Democrat Barney Franks. There was a gay prostitution ring running out of his house. He claimed, goshie darn, he had no idea it was happening.

As far as school shootings, the Republicans have taken care of that problem. It is called the Second Amendment, and it gives people the right to use firearms to defend themselves. Alas, the same clever security numbskulls who gave us 9/11 have decreed there shall be no guns in schools, thus making our students and teachers vulnerable to any one who wishes to violate the no-guns law. Get rid of that stupid law, and let our smarter teachers and principals protect the kids, instead of creating a situation where millions of kids are at risk every day.

2006-10-07 20:00:14 · answer #3 · answered by retiredslashescaped1 5 · 1 3

The money we are wasting on this war in Iraq could be put to much better use through prevention programs to protect our youth. Prevention is paramount. Unfortunately, gangs give its members something that they need: a sense of belonging. It is going to take time, money, energy, and education to turn things around and quash gang/s (violence).

It is not a simple matter of finger pointing, John. "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem."

2006-10-07 19:58:30 · answer #4 · answered by Rhonda 7 · 3 1

The law in Richmond Virginia provides that any conviction for a crime committed with a firearm gets a mandatory additional 5-year jail sentence on top of the ordinary sentence for the crime. This law has proven effective in reducing violent crime, and it should be passed in every state in the nation. (It has the full approval of the National Rifle Association, which was involved in developing the wording of the law).

2006-10-07 19:55:33 · answer #5 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 2 1

I see you figured out you governor is a Republican! What are you doing?

School shootings make the news, as do airline accidents, but neither are an issue that happens as often as you think!

You paint liberals with a broad Brush, when it is Republicans that are in power! You have a better chance of being hit by lightning than a victim of a school shooting, so don't try and make it major issue it is not! I am not saying not make schools safer, but their is no need for knee jerk reactions, and there is NO NEED to ignore major issues in the world that confront us! I know you are a Bush supporter!!

2,976 military have been killed in Iraq and even Rice and the Republicans today admitted it is out of control and something needs to be done..........before the elections! We should not be concerned about that? Or that Bush uses that for gutting the 4th amendment!

Let me give you a little FACT!! More children are killed by their parents every year than in a school, so stop raising the phony alerts that Bush is so famous for!

Why don't you do something about abusive parents! Oh I forgot, you don't like state agencies coming to your house and investigating child abuse! You think that you own them! NOT!

2006-10-07 19:47:12 · answer #6 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2 4

It is all part of The New World Order. That is what they want for now until they decide the force the system on everyone, including gang members who don't have jobs.

2006-10-07 20:30:22 · answer #7 · answered by stickinthemud 3 · 0 1

If they'd just get out of Iraq, there'd be a lot more money to pay for better security in schools, for crime prevention, for putting away your hated gangstas...all the things Republicans love to do in peace time. Oh man, what hypocracy you spew! If we started talking about improving schools instead of the war, you'd accuse us of abandoning the troops. Admit that Iraq is just a bone-dry Vietnam and get em home!

2006-10-07 19:54:34 · answer #8 · answered by William K 3 · 2 2

>Liberals are more concerned with overseas affairs than what is happening in their own cities.

Perhaps if Bush was more concerned about what was going on here we wouldn't still have issues with open borders, health care, education, etc. And perhaps our pages in Congress wouldn't still be exposed to pedophile republicans. Oh wait, my bad, the GOP loves to ignore that and let children's lives be harmed. Nice spin.

2006-10-07 19:53:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

here is an idea......seems to be a high concentration of liberal gangstas in cali......we lure the rest of the librals to cali through up a wall and let the gun laws / bullets fly.......the liberals can try to pass laws that tell the gangstas that they are bad and shouldnt behave like the criminals they are......and well the gangstas can do what they do and take care of a group of people who keep trying to take away our rights one step at a time....whoa...just thought of something......we may have to throw a few republicians over the wall to....didnt they want to tell us what to watch and read? hmmmm ... why cant they just leave the constitution and bill of rights alone...peace

2006-10-07 19:48:37 · answer #10 · answered by sltydgx 5 · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers