2006-10-07 12:42:00 · 8 answers · asked by thoo7i 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
There are none. Science is based on facts.
2006-10-07 12:46:46 · answer #1 · answered by stevewbcanada 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A fact is something that is proven to be true. Science cannot prove something, it can only disprove it. Hence, no facts. Furthermore, as stated, "science is derived from facts" does not make sense, as a method cannot be derived from facts, especially if that method is the same used to create said "facts", and even furthermore if "facts" are not "facts" at all.
I have hereby created the same circular reasoning used by contemporary christian religion: "God exists because the bible says he does, and the bible is true because God says it is."
2006-10-11 11:39:48 · answer #2 · answered by Kevin P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For:
---Good science only goes on what is seen or observed in some way
--Good scientists will use the simplest explanation for the facts
--Good scientists stick to the truth
Against:
--All fact is based on observation and the human brain filters it
--All fact assumes that there is a reality out there
--Anyone can make a mistake. but that is why there are peer reviewed journals.
2006-10-07 13:19:23 · answer #3 · answered by geocache22 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
precisely. it quite is like Block Watch human beings coming outdoors and tattling on everybody who could dare play outdoors on their block. The TOS are intentionally imprecise so as that the Yahoo! workers can use discretion and get rid of questions that would obey the letter of the TOS yet no longer the motive. Frankly, something is a contravention in case you squint and tilt your head slightly. If maximum human beings prefer to have the skill to ask questions, yet in basic terms some prefer to be vigilante tattletales and the tattletales are prevailing, then it quite is not community moderation. it quite is bullying. Yahoo! has never been damaging to bullying. i've got often asked for help with bullying, and that i've got seen my pals ask for help besides. i've got even seen my very own pals bully others, regrettably. no matter what happens, Yahoo! accepts (and for this reason condones) the bullying. EDIT: The reporting concern isn't in basic terms an R&S phenomenon. it quite is around the board. R&S is likely considered one of the busiest class, so it quite is felt extra solid here, however the journalists are everywhere. they are centred in busy categories. one could nonetheless positioned up stupid questions in low-use categories, yet there are extra violations everywhere. i've got been violated in each and every single place.
2016-10-15 23:05:08 · answer #4 · answered by woodworth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A "scientific fact" comes from originally a hypothesis that becomes a theory and "proved" by statistical evidence.
Many have assumptions of no undiscovered exceptions.
Science is not facts as such, but process of discovering, not the discovered.
2006-10-07 12:54:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know at least one- Science is not derived from facts, it's derived from opinions. It changes all the time.
2006-10-07 12:45:44 · answer #6 · answered by Ms. H 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Science is a process. It is a WAY of deriving. It is a pathway, not a destination.
2006-10-07 12:45:10 · answer #7 · answered by Holden 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
you won't get three accurate premises.
2006-10-07 12:50:38 · answer #8 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋