i just wanted to kno
2006-10-07 11:50:06 · 36 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Where have you been?!!!!!!!!!!!! VANITY FAIR
2006-10-07 21:12:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anne 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes and Suri are on the cover of Vanity Fair magazine's October issue, which was on newstands nationwide on Sept. 12. Vanity Fair had the first photos of the baby.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/06/ap/entertainment/mainD8JVG9EO1.shtml
http://www.abcactionnews.com/entertainment/stories/0609/060906cruisebaby.shtml
2006-10-07 11:52:01 · answer #2 · answered by Just Me 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Vanity Fair carried pictures this month.
One theory why it took them so long was that Suri had been born with a birthmark, that they couldn't have removed until she was months old.
Having seen the pics, I'm not sure there's any sign of this. Katie Holmes just said that she got fed up with media intrusion during her pregnancy so she decided to get her own back by refusing to release pics after the birth.
2006-10-07 11:54:14 · answer #3 · answered by pinksparklybirdy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Everyone has seen pictures of baby Suri, last month pictures of her in Vanity Fair along with Tom and Katie were published and all of the world saw them.
No one knows why they decided to wait until now to let everyone see Suri.
2006-10-07 11:58:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Try Vanity Fair. She looks like a miniature Katie Holmes. Same lopsided smile and loads of black hair.
2006-10-07 18:43:49 · answer #5 · answered by DeeDee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe it was because Tom was annoyed with the lack of interest from mags and went off in a huff because another celebrity couple were offered more money for photos of their baby. Think they have been in a mag now tho.
2006-10-07 11:57:48 · answer #6 · answered by Alicat 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tom has probably had her whisked away to the Mother ship to change a few genes so she won't be vertically challanged like dad. Come to think of it why has he not had it done as well if Scientology is so great.
2006-10-08 01:28:27 · answer #7 · answered by oilman 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they showed suri cruise on the cover of Vanity Fair and had a huge like album in there of pix in mid september
2006-10-07 11:54:14 · answer #8 · answered by meredithxc 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There has been photos published in an american magazine ... can't remember the name of it though ... try doing a search in google or google images, you should be able to find a pic.
2006-10-07 11:53:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of that celebrities dont have any privateness... ok, we could settle for it, its like that.... yet nor their babies? Thats abuse!! Why cant they simply be a relatives like many human beings... Theres no stunning to be messing around with others peoples families..... undesirable human beings they arent unfastened!!.... i think of she would be ready to be a eye-catching toddler for Katie, as this is for all the mums their very own toddler the prettiest, thats it...
2016-10-19 00:03:18 · answer #10 · answered by corl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a baby has been seen in magazines now, prob not much doubt that its katies, as for tom playing much part in the conception i doubt it very much...dont tell him i said that..cant afford legal action.
2006-10-07 11:59:47 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋