2006-10-07 11:34:18 · 23 answers · asked by aliya_de 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Benjamin Franklin said that whoever would give up the first to get more of the second would wind up with neither.
He was right.
;-)
2006-10-07 11:38:41 · answer #1 · answered by WikiJo 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Freedom
2006-10-07 20:54:48 · answer #2 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freedom
2006-10-07 20:09:57 · answer #3 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freedom
2006-10-07 18:36:59 · answer #4 · answered by Chewie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freedom
2006-10-07 18:36:55 · answer #5 · answered by Nico 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freedom
2006-10-07 18:36:06 · answer #6 · answered by Apollo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freedom
2006-10-07 18:35:48 · answer #7 · answered by jojo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freedom. Hands down.
2006-10-07 18:41:18 · answer #8 · answered by Jaded 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Freedom to make my own security!
2006-10-07 21:34:38 · answer #9 · answered by mom 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That depends on the times. If the enemy is bad enough I'll reluctantly give up freedoms temporarily. That's why there should be time limits on any law that takes away a freedom so we don't have to fight to get them back later. The law would expire in a specified time.
2006-10-07 18:42:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There must be a balance between the 2 complete freedom means you have no security. Complete security means you have no freedom.think about it
2006-10-07 18:38:42 · answer #11 · answered by dongeraldd 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋