I don't agree with anyone of you. Beckham is a very sportive player because even when he was dropped, he didn't come up and slam the manager. He agreed with Mclaren's decision and said that he would be ready to play for England whenever he was called up for.
Well, I totally disagree with you people that Beckham is over-rated.All of you say that Lennon is better than Beckham. This is absolutely rubbish. Has Lennon played 94 caps for England like Beckham. NO.So how can you judge a player from his performance in 1 or 2 caps for his nation.
Last night against Macedonia , England absolutely struggled to
keep possesssion of the ball. They missed the quality of David Beckham.
Many people say that Lampard is a better player than Beckham. Lampard didn't even score a goal whereas Beckham scored one and setup a couple of goals in the world cup . I think Mclaren's selection is very wrong.
2006-10-07 21:20:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Steve mcclaren prefers a team with wingers who have pace and can take a man on. Beckham has none of these attributes anymore. He is also a poor captain who doesnt shout or instill confidence to the players around him. Unlike J terry who is an excellent captain and proved it at chelsea.Beckham was also Svens lap dog and like all dogs your day will come.
2006-10-07 12:14:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Beckham can be over-rated, but the politics are interfering with who gets chosen for England's team. Perhaps Chris Evans should buy that team out, get influenced by blokes for Beckham, and then place his money on putting Beckham where those people (i.e. you) want him to be.
'Tis the only solution.
2006-10-07 11:32:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Scriptwriter_in_West_Los_Angeles 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
He is good enough !!! That coach wants other players for his own interest to suit his own reasons. Beckham can bend the ball and kick at long range with accuracy - he is an asset.
2006-10-07 12:36:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
little or no. What difference does it make? The capitency is rather no extra beneficial than an empty, insignificant ornament. Does it substitute the gamers on the sphere? the technique? the interest plan? infrequently. i understand the English won't get the factor I make, besides the undeniable fact that it rather, rather does not recommend squat, admit it or no longer.
2016-12-26 12:10:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
beckham is over rated.yes he has a great right foot but lennon is a more complete player and can dribble past players which beckham cannot do.
2006-10-07 11:29:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by steveo 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Beckham is probably the most over rated player there is. he sucks!
2006-10-07 11:25:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Halox 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Macclaren is an @sshole....how can he let go of beckham...theres no one in england team who can cross better then beckham....others sux...no wonder they drew with Macedonia...GET BACK BECKHAM!!!!!!......REMOVE MACCLREN(he sux)..............!!!!
2006-10-07 14:10:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by The guy next door 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
because (I think) he'll be 33 when Euro 2008 arrives. & he played **** in the world cup, lennon was better, ever ringo would outdo beckham.
2006-10-07 12:43:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by howaytheladlee 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
i agree with u dude...
so shock last morning watched eng played so badly...
macedonia is just a small and poor country....they also lack of experience.....
ENG were so dumb.....
i wanna the legend of ENG raised back....not what we had right now....so damn bad
2006-10-07 21:03:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋