English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-07 10:37:51 · 8 answers · asked by martin48732 1 in Science & Mathematics Physics

8 answers

Einstein didn't doubt quantum mechanics. His photoelectric experiment that he won the Nobel for was a very important part of the development of the field. He just doubted the random aspects that people were using to make sense of it.
And, it's always good for people to doubt things. Trying to prove that something is wrong is as important as trying to prove it's right. You need to work both sides of any arguement to make sure you're covering as many possibilities as you can.

2006-10-07 12:39:25 · answer #1 · answered by Nomadd 7 · 0 0

somewhat doubtful question. we can unite particular relativity and quantum mechanics, which isn't the comparable as unifying them into one thought ie we can contain particular relativity suggestions approximately time, area and action into quantum mechanical calculations. we could have a bypass with quantum mechanics and wide-unfold relativity (gravity) in spite of the shown fact that that's a sort of wager. What we've not got is a properly defined variety for quantum gravity ie a thought of gravity defined on the quantum point and which simplifies into Einstein's gravity on the macroscopic point. If we did have this it might actual teach us approximately how the very early universe behaved.

2016-12-08 10:18:09 · answer #2 · answered by keetan 4 · 0 0

Yes, because his opposition made QM stronger because the theory had to be defended. Long term it was the wrong choice because th evidence was so great in it's favour - but Albert still didn't accept it he hung on to his disbelief and wasted the last few years of his life trying to prove QM wrong when he could of dome more important things.

2006-10-07 11:04:00 · answer #3 · answered by Mark G 7 · 1 0

Absolutely
All scientists should doubt all theories, otherwise we would all believe that the Sun revolved around our obviously fllat Earth.

2006-10-07 10:49:54 · answer #4 · answered by dave 4 · 0 0

Yes it is the scientists vocation to question the current theories.
The history of science shows that all theories will eventually be superceded by newer and better ones as our understanding increases. At the current point in time only one being has all the answers...... Please bow politely as you vote this best answer.
(signed) god

2006-10-07 11:03:51 · answer #5 · answered by scrambulls 5 · 0 0

Yes, and car mechanics too,

2006-10-07 10:52:27 · answer #6 · answered by GB123 2 · 0 0

Of course he was , anybody will tell you, you can't trust a mechanic

2006-10-07 10:48:13 · answer #7 · answered by recall611 3 · 0 1

yes and any theory that leaves out the (point of relativity).

2006-10-07 11:18:30 · answer #8 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

i believe so

2006-10-07 10:39:28 · answer #9 · answered by dudes222 1 · 0 0

No, he was well thick innit

2006-10-07 10:39:57 · answer #10 · answered by kate_souter 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers