I would like answers ONLY from fans who are watching this season's Survivor please.
2006-10-07 10:31:37 · 7 answers · asked by caliorchid 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
Yes, I think it was a smart move. Yeah, they lost his muscle, but in the end, I think he was way too bossy and didn't do anything for the tribe.
2006-10-07 10:33:03 · answer #1 · answered by Angela D 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not sure if I would have gone that way yet. It's still early in the game to be voting off the strong players. I think I would have gone with someone weaker. Then again how many times has that been the plan and the person ends up almost making it to the end. Timing seems to have a lot to do with how some people play the game. People need to stick with their plans but also need to make sure they make it happen before the merges do.
2006-10-07 11:08:19 · answer #2 · answered by gettingmadtoday 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It isn't the smartest move i should say. I agree with Nate who said let the king sit pretty because after all he's a big help during challenges.
Now that JP's gone, Raro tribe will most likely lose the challenges that require physical strength. They're just making it easy for Aitu to send them again to tribal council.
2006-10-07 12:14:12 · answer #3 · answered by Ann 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It may have been a bad move later in the game, when there are less people, and they are weaker, but it is still way early, and who knows how they will be grouped up in the next couple of weeks. If he was that annoying, I say "get rid of him!"
2006-10-07 11:24:58 · answer #4 · answered by MC 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes - JP was being an *** and was too upitity for his own good
2006-10-08 15:36:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It was smart. The guy was a chucker. Good Luck! :)
2006-10-07 10:33:23 · answer #6 · answered by tysavage2001 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes I do.
2006-10-07 10:32:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋