http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LcC8ikhZ4Y&mode=related&search=
this makes ashley sound ridiculously amazing
2006-10-07 10:10:16 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
i mean ashley usually does sound better than V.A.H but i mean V.A.H used to be ok what happened, i was going to give V.A.H a chance, she is so skrewed
2006-10-07 10:14:40 · update #1
she really sounds aweful singing live.Ashlee Simpson is a good singer but I get your point. Vanessa sounds really off key and it just doesn't sound good at all live.
2006-10-07 10:40:59 · answer #1 · answered by :) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all of them sound poor,Axl is up fu--ked if he theory this replace into gunna be a a huge supplier,he waited 14 years even the band had to go away XD... without the soul of shrink,izzy,duff and steve there heavily isn't a "reliable" weapons and roses album and im in all probability incorrect human beings will nonetheless bypass purchase it simply by fact it has the words weapons N Roses ,im in simple terms waiting now to work out what number quite everyone seems to be going to purchase(im unlikely to even acquire it,wast of area)
2016-12-13 03:58:43 · answer #2 · answered by endicott 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She sounds horrible not because she's singing live (as one person stated) but because she IS horrible and she was lip-synching to the CD.
Just my humble opinion, of course...
2006-10-08 08:04:44 · answer #3 · answered by My Evil Twin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That was a good live performance. Would you have prefered a lip-synched performance instead?
2006-10-07 12:17:53 · answer #4 · answered by Reggaeton Ambassador 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i know what you mean. she is soooo fake and bubblegummy. im not a huge AT fan, but yes she is way better! blah!
2006-10-07 15:41:02 · answer #5 · answered by i am the dream u r the dreamer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ok
2006-10-07 10:59:13 · answer #6 · answered by . 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i know.....they are both bad!
2006-10-07 10:11:19 · answer #7 · answered by A Pirate's Life For ME ;) 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋