How about you turn the computer off once in a while, go out and talk to a woman instead of buying amateur hour pornography?
2006-10-07 09:43:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
neither, they're both pseudo porn for 14 year olds who don't dare buy the 'real thing'. bit pointless in the internet age. gq is ab out the only half intelligent men's mag that you don't have to be embarrassed about reading in public...
2006-10-07 09:35:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
zoo! have read both and i like the facts at the bottom of zoo's pages, amongst other things... its funny and lgiht hearted too as well as the obvious assets !
2006-10-11 00:58:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by jones_linz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It has to be nuts, because it gives you the perfect opportunity to be really adolescent and go up to a girl and say: "Hey, would you mind holding my nuts for a moment while I tie my shoelaces?".
2006-10-07 09:35:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by John P 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Whichever one the absolutely mindblowing Sophie Howard is in ;-)
BTW, what is it with the women in those cheaper-priced mags? The majority of them are pug-ugly and with fake **** and hair! What's that all about?
2006-10-07 09:32:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Guys nuts obviously. lol
2006-10-07 09:37:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by MGN2006 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
id say nuts, and for the retard who thinks there cheap, nuts is weekly so 4 x £1.30 = £5.20 and thats a bit more than FHM
2006-10-07 09:34:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by alex 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I've not read either, I prefer the harder 'escort' type ones. Only get those occasionally - I tend to just download porn.
2006-10-07 09:31:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
zoo its good
2006-10-08 20:42:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jerry 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
FHM you cheapskate
2006-10-07 09:31:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋