Any evidence whatsoever for either of these?
Or is it the usual Rush inspired bs?
2006-10-07 07:52:27 · 5 answers · asked by Dastardly 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
So Jesi - pretty much no hard evidence. Just convenient speculation by the smear machine. And you guys call Dems nut job conspiracy theorists!
2006-10-07 08:08:31 · update #1
Because, at their core, many of them are smear merchants uninterested in the truth.
2006-10-07 07:59:08 · answer #1 · answered by PrimeConcern 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
well Jesi got it right. besides the corner said the gun was lodged in Mr. Fosters hand in a way that he could not have shoot himself. the investigator's tore down trees , bushs and cleared 100 yards around the place the body was found. did not find the bullet that came from the gun in his hand. found bullets from as far back as 1700 s but not from that gun. also had a jogger in that said he saw two man doing something on that hill where his body was found.
if you want to watch something intersting, watch Waco rules of engagement . if this happened while a republican was in the white house they would have been put in jail.
2006-10-07 22:06:25 · answer #2 · answered by rap1361 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They sanitized his office and had the Park Police, not Capital Police or FBI investigate it. The investigation was designed to fail. Vince Foster did not display any of the tell tale signs of suicide and his psychological profile did not indicate he was the type to commit suicide. There was no suicide note or other evidence he committed suicide. He was murdered. Who murdered him and why evidence was tampered with and why the investigation was designed to fail from the start are still open questions.
Since he had evidence of the Clinton's role in Whitewater, and was involved himself, and there are a number of convenient suicides and accidental deaths surrounding the Clinton's through their career it is pretty obvious they played a role in his death. If in no other manner, they made sure the killer would not be found.
2006-10-07 15:00:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is just retaliation for Dems making stuff up about Hastert. Just like Repubs blaming Clinton for 9/11 is just retaliation for Dems blaming Bush. Dems seem to forget that they shouldn't throw stone lies when they live in a glass house on the edge of the Cliff of Truth.
2006-10-07 14:55:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why do liberals have such a hard time believing the Clintons are nothing more than grifters and carpetbaggers??
2006-10-07 15:03:32 · answer #5 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋