English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-07 06:55:26 · 4 answers · asked by aquarius5snake 1 in News & Events Media & Journalism

4 answers

Pros: it's still free and the first 5 grades seem like they are on top of things

Cons: No school choice, like they have in plenty of other countries that offer free education and are kicking our butts in EVERY known test.

We are falling WAY frickin behind, and everybody is too busy pointing fingers and placing blame instead of simply doing something about it.

The UAW killed the domest car companies, and now the teacher's union is on the same track with American education

It's not money, magnet and charter schools consistently kick the every living sh!t out of public school kids on tests, and compete equally with private school kids at 1/10 the budget per student public schools use.

2006-10-07 07:05:53 · answer #1 · answered by Manny 6 · 1 0

Some states have taxes to fund school districts and that helps keeping good salaries for teacher which helps in teacher retention. The Department of education had adressed a lot of curriculum issues in the past but you can say slowly.

Cons: Disconnection between curriculum and real economic develompemts according to city industry.
Hard to maintain teacher updated with the constan evolutions in different fields.
Separation between religion and state makes moral and religious education enemies in the true education of an individual leading the way to moral relativism in our society.
Critical thinking skills are not fomented in many schools.

2006-10-07 14:59:32 · answer #2 · answered by ION-CONSTITUTION 2 · 0 0

I think it would be an excellent idea.

May your days be truly joyful.

2006-10-07 21:21:05 · answer #3 · answered by The Gadfly 5 · 0 0

very expensive!

2006-10-08 13:53:26 · answer #4 · answered by lisette 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers