If it is the first visit to the mound in the inning the pitcher could still pitch under the rules of baseball; however, if it is the second visit to the mound in the inning, a pitching change must be made.
I would think it is highly inadvisable to say no to the manager when he wishes to remove you from the game. A pitcher, like all other players on the team, must respect the manager's decisions on what is best for the team. It makes a pitcher look self-centered and arrogant if he defies a manager, and this will usually result in his playing time being diminshed or a visit to an AAA minor league team to learn respect for the system and the manager.
2006-10-07 06:57:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by msi_cord 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Rule is 2 mound visits an inning for the same pitcher he auto out of the game and that rule applies for the same pitcher 3 times in a game.
2006-10-07 13:06:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by ADS 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The pitcher can say whatever he wants. But that is highly unlikely to change the mind of the manager, especially if the pitcher is young. Veteran pitchers may get away with this.
If it is the second mound trip during the inning, the pitcher *must* leave the game.
2006-10-07 09:11:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by The ~Muffin~ Man 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure. They can protest if they want, but usually, a manager's mind is made up before he even leaves the dugout.
Some managers leave the decision up to the pitcher. For example, a manager may go to the mound to ask the pitcher if he can get this next batter out (99.99999% of the time, the pitcher will say, "Yes").
Good managers make the decision to pull the pitcher before they even step foot outside the dugout.
2006-10-07 06:56:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by hawk79 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the manager makes a second trip to the mound, then MLB rules dictate that the pitcher must be removed from the game.
However, in the past, pitchers have been allowed to stay in the game against their managers will, but basically, they'd have to convince their manager to do it. But if its the manager's second trip, they have no choice.
What the manager says, goes, and the player would have to try and change their mind.
2006-10-07 06:54:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Adam C 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Once the manager goes to the mound, the pitcher has to go. If the pitching coach goes to the mound he can tell him he wants to stay and he can.
2006-10-07 07:55:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Donna J 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The plate umpire has the accountability to make sure the dimensions of of a communication. there is not any pre-desperate time cut back, its in basic terms a judgment call. lets say its a coach talking to his pitcher. If the ump orders the coach to bypass away and the coach purposly ignores him, the the umpire will eject the coach. If the coach nevertheless refused to bypass away after being ejected, the umpire could forfeit the sport as thats interior of his discretion. you will by no potential see considered one of those scenerio like this in expert baseball. something like I basically defined would take place on the youngsters point, rather in all threat a discern/coach who's a jerk. the main significant reason maximum discussions destroy up as quickly as the umpire heads in direction of the mound is by technique of the fact the final element a glass and his catcher opt to do is piss off the umpire.
2016-12-08 10:10:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They can say anything they want.
The manager is in charge and has the final word.
Unless the manager caves and lets the pitcher go.
Ask Grady Little of Pedro Martinez about that.
2006-10-07 07:00:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by nickkap1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah i wonder that too
cant the pitchers come off themselves,? when tey know that they are sucking
2006-10-07 06:56:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not in their best interest. The manager is in charge of the team, he is the players' "boss", in effect. Tell your boss no sometime and see what happens. :)
2006-10-07 10:52:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by frenchy62 7
·
0⤊
0⤋