Some time back I joined Y/A hoping to find eye opening info, thanks for letting me know my quest was not in vain. Now, why don't you watch a football game or something ?
2006-10-07 05:48:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by sluggo1947 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is some anthropological evidence that in the past older men monopolized access to younger women. In many societies warriors were not allowed to consort with the opposite sex-- they had to retire from that (proving their ability to survive) and then gather the resources necessary to procure a wife.
However, this is purely a matter of the male dominator power and nothing that is based on biology or on inevitability. In many of these societies, great power was ascribed to women because of their ability to give birth, and this was used as a method of both monopolizing sex and controlling women at the same time.
DNA only has genetic information-- nothing learned over a lifetime can be inherited. Genetic information only changes through mutation or recombination. Natural selection acts on those changes. Sometimes a population becomes seperated and genetic drift will carry them apart, and sometimes those populations will come back into contact and gene flow will spread accumulated changes throughout one or the other population. Sometimes one group never reunites, and the few who were seperated have common traits that were variable in the larger population and thus the entire population becomes defined as a seperate group by virtue of having a trait or handful of traits greatly magnified or widespread (the founder effect).
2006-10-07 21:00:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by almethod2004 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The sperm doesn't evolve over the guy's life. In fact, as other people have mentioned, it gets worse- the children of older guys have more problems. Evolution takes a really long time, and you don't see it happening in a single person over their lifetime. Also, women contribute just as much DNA as men do to the fetus, so even if your way, way out-there idea were true, which it totally isn't, it would work with older women, too.
2006-10-07 12:54:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by random6x7 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
this is stated in somewhat some early Christian writings. One artwork, customary using fact the Proto-evangelium of James (A.D. one hundred twenty five) information that Joseph replaced into chosen from a team of widowers to serve using fact the husband/protector of Mary, who replaced right into a virgin consecrated to God. whilst he replaced into chosen, Joseph objected: "I even have babies, and that i'm an previous guy, and he or she is a youthful female" (4:9). EDITED to function: we've much less data helping what all of us understand of the childrens of George Washington, the 1st few kings of britain, the existence of William Shakespeare, the writings of Socrates, etc -- in case you have faith those issues have historic benefit, there is not any reason to doubt the Proto-evangelium of James.
2016-10-18 23:37:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by cardish 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In any lab I have been in, the DNA is the same if it is frozen for thirty years and then tested against a new sample. The "coding" was written at conception and does not change with out an outside force, ie: radioactive isotopes.
2006-10-10 08:02:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by DS143 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, there is no rule.
Nature and libidos do the job properly and do not need statistical studies.
Youth is a blessing, and must be lived by young people between 14 and 94...
2006-10-07 09:28:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sweet Dragon 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
My parents are 20 years apart. Dad is 92 and Mom is 72.
2006-10-07 05:38:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Demon Doll 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sounds like you've been watching Dateline NBC and have come up with a lame excuse to see younger, under age girls. Go do something of value.
2006-10-07 07:05:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I guess you are unaware of the recently published study that men over 40 can produce genetically inferior sperm.
2006-10-07 05:39:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I dint know what your talking about but it is a fact that older fathers are more likely to have autistic children
2006-10-07 05:46:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by pandorasbox40 3
·
1⤊
1⤋