English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i heard that you can get paid for taking part in medical trials,is this true and ,how would i find out ,thanks

2006-10-07 04:41:07 · 7 answers · asked by KELLY E 1 in Social Science Gender Studies

7 answers

I have done a medical study here in Austin, TX that paid $2000 for 4 day stay, and 2 followups (they took quite a few blood draws in the 4 days)...

the link for them is below...

there are other companies that do the same thing in various cities.

You can do an advanced search on Yahoo for "Pharmaceutical Drug Study" if the link just below does not work:

http://search.yahoo.com/search?_adv_prop=web&x=op&ei=UTF-8&fr=fp-top&fr2=op&va_vt=any&vp=%22Pharmaceutical+Drug+Study%22&vp_vt=any&vo_vt=any&ve_vt=any&vd=all&vst=0&vf=all&vm=i&fl=0&n=10

2006-10-07 04:54:25 · answer #1 · answered by ♥Tom♥ 6 · 0 0

Just learn from the example of others who have participated in medical experiments which went horribly wrong. There was a terrible case earlier this year where several young men were injured during an apparently harmless trial, some of them permanently. A close relative of mine developed skin cancer as the result of participating in medical research and agreeing to take an overdose of steroids. Find some other way of earning cash.

2006-10-10 05:04:25 · answer #2 · answered by Doethineb 7 · 0 0

almost each rape isn't considered to be a "violent" rape. which ability the suspect wasn't some stranger who attacked, overpowered, and raped the sufferer, however the sufferer and the suspect have been acquaintances or acquaintances. One suggested it became rape. the different suggested "What?!?" in short, human beings nonetheless have faith that females are people who make the determination to have intercourse - no longer the adult males. the known theory is that the guy would have intercourse with every person who became keen (no longer announcing that I agree, yet i think of you would be mendacity to your self in case you probably did no longer agree maximum persons this this way). If a females has intercourse with somewhat some adult males, then she probable would be keen to have intercourse with the guy she's claiming to rape her. If she in no way has intercourse with every person, she probable does no longer have been. organising the alleged sufferer as a woman with questionable morals will make the guy's tale plenty extra available. in the he suggested, she suggested circumstances, there could be credibility common on the two factors (no longer in basic terms the girls human beings). the subject such as your perspective is which you're stepping into there assuming the guy is accountable, and that the girl became raped. The regulation is "harmless until shown accountable." verify out what you typed: "So what? If a woman is a virgin, being raped is plenty extra adverse and the rapist merits to be punished extra so than if the girl has had intercourse in the previous?! Or in case you do no longer gown like a nun, then you definately could've been maximum advantageous the guy on and sh*t?! Or if a woman gets below the impression of alcohol, she's in charge for her very own rape?! No ask your self rape is the main below suggested crime! i does no longer document a rape if I new i'd be made to look as though a terrible disgusting sl*t for it." think of approximately that suggestions-set - you're implying that the girl became certainly raped, that would or won't be the case. that's no longer how the courts are "meant" to artwork. Being raped is adverse no remember who you're or what your previous became. besides the undeniable fact that, organising the credibility of your shopper, and the lackthereof of the defendent is going to bypass a protracted way. Who would you think extra? An harmless virgin announcing some jerk with a much extra promiscuous previous raped her? Or some woman who's slept with dozens of adult males announcing that this one "took benefit" of her? The virgin is in basic terms plenty extra available.

2016-12-26 11:55:21 · answer #3 · answered by schwager 3 · 0 0

I'd be a little concerned about what they would be doing to you. You'd basically sign your rights away and become the human guinea pig. You'd probably be better off & safer if you just took a weekend job as a waiter/waitress or bartender. But if your dead set on it here's a few links.

2006-10-07 07:56:34 · answer #4 · answered by low_on_ram 6 · 1 0

you are willing to have unknown substances injected into your body after what happened to the ones that were featured on the news in the UK?

2006-10-10 11:03:04 · answer #5 · answered by geehaich 2 · 0 0

I would rather stand on the street corner in a mini skirt and sell matches, like Little Nell in times gone by.
Don`t any of you listen to,watch or read the news?

2006-10-07 12:43:44 · answer #6 · answered by Social Science Lady 7 · 0 3

You won't need the extra.
Are you so isolated that you don't read the news.
Six lives have been ruined in pursuit of money.
Live within your means and be happy.

2006-10-07 04:59:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers