The U.S. forces in Iraq are to blame for 44,000 civilian deaths, if they can kill those civilains so easily, why are they trailing the one guy that they were looking for in the first place, and who they blame to be the cause of these civilian deaths? Why can't they kill him??
2006-10-07 03:52:53 · 15 answers · asked by gee.tar1 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
hey, the U.S. didn't kill 44,00 civilians.
It was those radical Islamic terrorists in Iraq. They blew up those bombs.
2006-10-07 03:55:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
When a Muslim straps a suicide belt on, and blows himself and a whole lot of women and kids to bits at a crowded shopping center, you count them as being killed by the Americans. How can the Americans stop Muslims from killing each other.
While we're there, about three thousand Muslims are murdered by Muslims. If America leaves now that number will shoot up to the sky. With a full blown civil war going on in Iraq, you can be sure the other Muslim nations will be sucked in.
If you're smart, you'll get down on your knees, show your rear end to the heavens, and thank Allah that the Americans are preventing real slaughter.
2006-10-07 04:15:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Civilians were / are being killed and persecuted long before the States went there so who are you trying to fool? Just because we hear about it now and not before doesn't mean it wasn't going on.There has always been crazies blowing up little kids and their moms in the name of religion there. This is why the USA is welcome there by the people who aren't too afraid to show their support .The others are either brainwashed or are just too scared of being killed for having the audacity to want freedom of choice.
2006-10-07 04:23:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because U. S. wanted to keep 'the reason of killing people and destroying nations' alive, till they grab the entire world and kill more and more civilians. It is the nature of west and most particularly of the Americans.
2006-10-07 05:37:52 · answer #4 · answered by mushtaqehind 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where did you come up with the 44,000 civilians. How many of these deaths were from IED's? How many from suicide bombers? How many from the infiltrators from Iran and other Arabian countries? Now how many from activities of the United States Armed Services? I wish we could find him and kill him. But then you would most likely say we should have captured him and brought him to justice. You will never be happy.
2006-10-07 03:58:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well, the U.S. could just send 100,000 troops into the sovereign nation of Pakistan hoping to find Bin Laden. If they did that thousands of people would die, and all hell would break lose over the action.
Killing Bin Laden won't end (or even hinder) the Islamic Jihad movement. In some ways it would even help terrorism.
The anti-war crowd is in the convenient position of being able to use "Grass-is-Greener" logic. By simply saying something that hasn't been tried war critics assert that what hasn't been tried is the cure-all for the problem, when in actuality none of their suggestions have any merit.
2006-10-07 04:07:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
1st of all u got the facts wrong. The Iraqis of sunni and shite are killing among temselves. This is due to the fact they cannot agree on the formation of an Iraqi govt and also Al Qaeda in Iraq fuelling the fire thru brainwashing people to become suicide bombers. So, now let me tell u something. If u are a American, u should be ashamed to call yourself one by criticising your own country. If u are not, than u are a piece of pig **** who needs a kick in the ***.
2006-10-07 04:20:18 · answer #7 · answered by Scouser7674 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The insanity of war . . . unfortunately the planet has never had a long enough break from war to get smart.
The insanity feeds on itself. Figure out a way to give the planet a, say, a 100 year break and you will win the big prize.
2006-10-07 04:02:52 · answer #8 · answered by kate 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
becoz civilians dont strike back.they r helpless.they arent dangerous.we kill lot of chickens a day.no one protests.same with civilians.in fact usa has worst record over geneva convention.its same: u preach but dont follow it.n history is written by winners.who will remember 44000 died or 10 million died.they will try to convince less deaths of their own soldiers n it will be printed in all worlds history text books.iraq civilians?who cares?let them die.anyway they were helping terrorists.got it?read other answers u will find truth.these peoples even havent seen or faced any difficulties in life.they will read newspapers watch tv news n will provide their opinions.there arent any real terrorists in usa n still they worried from thousands km away.nobody has guts to fight with usa.but their citizens are scared to death over frantic imaginations.maybe they r cowards.
2006-10-07 03:58:47 · answer #9 · answered by rangeela 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
We in the USA have remained free because we are like a rabid pit bull dog. Someone (Osama Baby) decided to take out their BB gun and take some pot shots at the rabid pit bull. We don't like being shot with BB guns so we are going to rip things to shreds until the BB gun is in pieces and anyone else with a BB gun will think twice before shooting it. Now this is all hidden beneath a bunch of politics and Whala!!! You have Democracy!
GOD bless ya.
2006-10-07 04:07:28 · answer #10 · answered by Bye Bye 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
what 44,000 innocent civilians were killed by the US Force....First, Coalition forces are there , 2nd, In war their are casualties on all sides. 3rd , Move on to other issues that are more important
2006-10-07 04:05:23 · answer #11 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋