Should I drop Kevan Barlow (NYJ) and add C. Buckholter (phi)?
I know Westbrook is questionable for the Dallas game, but is this a good move in the long run?
I don't have any other RB's except Turner (SD).(I got into my draft late, but I do have stud WR's and Qb McNabb.
2006-10-07 01:20:43 · 6 answers · asked by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Buckhalter will play sparingly as long as Westbrook is healthy. Barlow is the starter in NY and will get the goal-line carries and the bulk of the work. Neither is great, but Barlow is better. Trade oneof your stud WRs for an upgrade at RB.
2006-10-07 01:41:49 · answer #1 · answered by fabika 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fabika has a great idea, but I will expand on it. There are twice as many starting WR than RB in the NFL. If you got some WR studs, then it is safe to say that others in your league drafted duds. Guys like Jenkins, or even Galloway in TB are now worth a toilet. Up and comers like Mike Furrey and Berrian in Chitown may be outh there. The thing to look for is worth. Trade a savage WR for a back with great value and you will be ok. Then, go into the waiver/free agaent pool and pull some more underrated talent onto your roster. Best bet is to find the one or two teams in your league that are losing games by a WRs numbers AND have a good running back that sits bench for them. Sell them on the idea and you are looking at a championship trophy. Keep barlow though, starters are better than backups.
2006-10-07 02:01:52 · answer #2 · answered by Joe C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd keep Barlow because Barlow is going to get the majority of the carries and it sounds like Westbrook is going to play.
2006-10-07 02:00:09 · answer #3 · answered by dylanbre917 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't drop a starter for a backup... Keep Barlow.
Besides, Westbrook has an annoying habit of being hurt all week, missing practices, then getting healed up enough to play anyway come Sunday.
2006-10-07 02:18:58 · answer #4 · answered by Proto 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lynch is unquestionably in, simply by fact the Seahawks are staying with the working game as Wilson is finally settling in, yet continues to be somewhat shaky. between Gore and green-Ellis, i might bypass with green-Ellis simply by fact projections show G-E having greater factors, and the Bengals have been tight of their offense for authentic skill interior the working game.
2016-12-13 03:44:59 · answer #5 · answered by tollefson 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
salmon
2006-10-07 01:21:27 · answer #6 · answered by barbel_basher 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋