She does realize that it was her sons' desicion to join up and accept the risks that are involved in such a desicion? That he gave his life for God and Country, so she could waste her time and have her protest, her freedom of speech. Who else feels that her poor son deserves to be honored instead of disrespected by his own mother?
2006-10-06 19:26:41 · 11 answers · asked by thegunz7304 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Good point I agree with you it was his choice. Many solders have been killed in the past to allow her to do what she does. I wonder if she realizes that. God Bless the USA and thanks to all military persons and Cindy Sheehans son too.
2006-10-06 21:10:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
words have which potential. there is not any which potential to believing vampires for eternal salvation. How is that to any extent further significant than asking if we could constantly have self belief in laser-cat, lochness monster, or tin-foil, for eternal salvation? Your occasion, designed to be a parallel to the Christian message, is incomprehensible gibberish. Atheism posits a meaningless universe, so i assume that explains why words and proposition are all the two meaningless to atheists. which potential to words don't matter to you. which potential in the back of the message does not matter to you. Why is that? because you're an atheist. You carry to a worldview the place the know-how isn't God, the place words are meaningless, because of the fact each and every little thing is incomprehensible. it truly is why you atheists see no concern comparing God to unicorns and fairies. because of the fact atheists do no longer think of, questioning approximately which potential is heresy between braindead atheists. edit: Oh, I see, so as long as we conceive of vampires in a clean and diverse way, in a fashion corresponding to how we conceive of God, then your assessment could be significant then? Why provide up there? permit's provide up conceiving of tin-foil interior the "classic way" and conceive interior the hot way, permit's provide it divine attributes and salvific skill so as that question could be significant additionally. rattling, you atheists are something else. i could say you're dumber than a field of rocks, yet which would be providing you with too lots credit.
2016-10-15 22:36:46 · answer #2 · answered by janovich 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A sad mom, trying to find the answer many people are starting to ask...why did the US invade a country that never attacked the US or was a real threat real or imagined. Her son was not "regular" army, he was like many young people who sign up for a weekend a month and two weeks a year to better themselves and get an education. You can well imagine non of them expected to be in a desert hell hole. I believe she just wants to hear the government admit their mistakes and make sure no
soldier is left forgotten.
The most disrespectful thing in this war I have seen is pictures of flag draped caskets and ramp ceremonies have been forbidden for a long time. The same thing was tried here in Canada for our soldiers in Afghanistan...the country went into an uproar and the media with the families permission is allowed to mark a soldiers repatriation ceremony. It allows a nation to grieve along with the families.
2006-10-06 19:37:59 · answer #3 · answered by Cherry_Blossom 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, she is not being respectful of her son. You are right, he was not drafted, he joined. Obviously, he went in for a reason of his own. For her to do what she is doing and then not get the kid a headstone tells me she is looking for attention.
2006-10-06 19:36:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
She lost a son in a war she did not believe in. This is what she says now. Her younger son told the media that she did up untill his brother died. Her husband divorced her because she refused to honor her sons death. The younger son has stated that he is ashamed of his mother and wants nothing to do with her.
2006-10-06 19:36:40 · answer #5 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I feel very sorry for her son and his memory to be embarrassed by her. If she was really that upset about his death and is that grievous I think she would have at least gotten a grave headstone for him (which she could have gotten for free from the government). But, she must not care about her son as much as she would like us to believe because she won't even do that.
2006-10-06 19:35:24 · answer #6 · answered by ♥ady_8e_80♥ 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think one day she is really going to regret the things she has done. I feel sorry for her that she has lost a son, but it was his choice to enlist. I also think that she is on her own trip about herself instead of it being about her son. I feel even worse for her other son who felt like he had to disown her to have peace in his own life.
2006-10-06 20:06:46 · answer #7 · answered by nite_raideress 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
not me. i think she's really pissed that her son died and many other service men and women are dying for a war in iraq that is unrelated to the terrorist attacks on the U.S. and seems to be more about oil interests in iraq, and seems to be destabilizing the region more and making more people and nations dislike the U.S. i don't think she is questioning her sons reasons for joining the service, but rather she is questioning the way his services were used by our government. our servicemen's lives should not be put in jeopardy unless absolutely necessary! we should have focused on getting bin laden and not wasted time and lives in iraq!
2006-10-06 19:43:11 · answer #8 · answered by guppy 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
She's a wacky lady. If she is sooooooooo against the war, she should have told her son not to go.
2006-10-06 19:38:01 · answer #9 · answered by newyorkgal71 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
she isa distraught mother
2006-10-06 19:32:37 · answer #10 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋