English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

I think those who accept the governments' version should be.
I think its disrespectful to all those people who died not to have a serious independent investigation!
I think those who call others with legitimate questions about 9/11 conspiracy nuts,wackos, whatever...are the real traitors...why would you not want real answers....the 9/11 commission was a farce of justice.That the Department of Justice consistently chooses to see accused 9/11 plotters go free rather than permit the courtroom testimony of al Qaeda leaders in American custody looks bad, but only because we don't have all the facts.

That the White House balked at any inquiry into the events of 9/11, then starved it of funds and stonewalled it, was unfortunate, but since the commission didn't find for conspiracy it's all a non issue anyway.

That the 9/11 commission's executive director and "gatekeeper," Philip Zelikow, was so closely involved in the events under investigation that he testified before the the commission as part of the inquiry, shows only an apparent conflict of interest.

That commission chair Thomas Kean is, like George Bush, a Texas oil executive who had business dealings with reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mafouz, suggests Texas is smaller than they say it is.

That co-chair Lee Hamilton has a history as a Bush family "fixer," including clearing Bush Sr of the claims arising from the 1980 "October Surprise", is of no concern, since only conspiracists believe there was such a thing as an October Surprise.

2006-10-06 18:11:24 · answer #1 · answered by dstr 6 · 4 5

I would say that this is typical of the people who follow Fox News fot their information.
Most of the people who are aware that 9/11 was an inside job have spent considerable time researching facts, and are using their minds in a logical fashion, whilst their critics tend to present their case from an emotional point of view, with no logical or critical thinking to back up their emotions.

Because of their apathy in the way they are being government, every one in America is being institutionalised into a police state, with no rights and no freedom.

If what you said was to become true, then you have a considerable number of free thibking intelligent people in one place, and they would probably present a viable alternative to those in the White House

2006-10-09 00:19:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No one looks into the enormous amount of scientific facts or government records that support their claim. You really don't deserve to call yourself informed until you take a look at why they might believe it was an inside job.

Do you know why all the "hijackers" have been reported alive by Al-Jazeera?
Or why the twin towers happened to be the only steel-framed buildings in the world to burn down from a fire?
Didn't think so.
Watch Loose Change and form your own opinion.
Google "Loose Change"

2006-10-07 01:12:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

There is obvious reason to be suspicious. People bought huge amounts of derivatives against the market the day before. The republicans are people who clearly have no qualms about engaging in election tricks while proclaiming the greatest love of democracy. Can't put anything past people like that.

If we're going to start institutionalizing people we disagree with, or calling everyone crazy who questions orthodoxy, then we might as well stop calling this America and change it to something that sounds bleak and scary.

I think people who think we can win in Iraq have a mental problem(and have for a long time), but you don't see me calling for mass re-educations.

2006-10-07 01:34:52 · answer #4 · answered by Jeremy 2 · 2 6

Do I think it was an inside job? No. Do I think those people are crazy? No.

The government has performed VD experiments on Black men. They have sold drugs to the poor to fund Latin American troops. The Iran-Contra Scandal. Watergate. The "Magic Bullet" theory.

How in the world can you state that people are crazy for thinking conspiracy after finding out our government has done it before?

2006-10-07 01:19:35 · answer #5 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 5 3

I do believe they would be the ideal customer for an online auction of the Golden Gate Bridge

2006-10-07 01:15:34 · answer #6 · answered by scottlcdl 2 · 4 2

If you send the nutjobs who believe democrats outed Foley along with them.

2006-10-07 01:12:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

We should probably sterilize them. No reason to have more nuts that believe crap like that running around.
Lobotomies might be a cure for their paranoia.

2006-10-07 01:38:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I think everyone should be opened minded and look at the facts that are presented and people who think like that shouldn't be called unamerican as they are now because of misunderstanding and ignorance some of the stuff they want you to believe isn't scientifically possible

2006-10-07 01:19:02 · answer #9 · answered by ozzydaisy@sbcglobal.net 1 · 2 4

Naw. They are off center. The harnessed are just powerful.

2006-10-07 01:23:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers