The greatest threat is from anything that the CIA can get their hands on.
Most terrorism is conducted by the secret services, primarily CIA/MI6/Mossad/ISI, who between them are responsible for 9/11, 7/7, Madrid train bombing, Bali bombing, Mumbai train bombing, Lockerbie air disaster, and loads more.
What the war on terrorism is all about is to keep the people frightened enough so that they give up their freedoms in exchange for ill-perceived security.
The idea of terrorism is to promote the agenda of the Illuminati/New World Order, who control the governments, and their secret services. That agenda is to take control of the entire world, remove over half the population, and reduce the freedoms of the remainder to the levels of slavery.
An Illuminati Primer
http://www.rinf.com/news/nov05/illuminati.html
Rothschild/Rockefeller
The Architecture of Modern Political Power
http://dgwa1.fortunecity.com/fourthreich/rockroth.html
2006-10-10 01:16:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A dirty bomb. Real nukes are expensive and terribly expensive to build. A dirty bomb is cheap and while there is no impressive mushroom cloud can leave a large area uninhabitable for decades until the area is deconned.
For terrorist group to use a nuke would bring international scorn and they would be hunted with prejudice. If they use a dirty bomb they will still be hated, but in some corners will get respect for showing restraint in not using a real nuke
2006-10-06 17:46:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Radiation Dispersal device a person wouldn't even know it happened or is happening
The other two bomb make a big Bang where the other can be a device that slowly leaks out posion and know one never no it tell it is too late.
I heard that something to that effect has happened and the government keeping a lead on it in the USA around Canada borders but still in the USA
2006-10-06 18:00:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i could say the "clean and recent possibility" could be the two a grimy bomb or radiation dispersal device. Nukes will come from a rustic with a death want - nuke us, we nuke them back, end of tale. a grimy bomb ought to be carried around in somebody's backpack. Any wellbeing midsection ought to grant the launching pad for a radiation dispersal device. And what of a bio-attack that ought to be carried around in a soda can.
2016-10-02 00:54:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by blumenkrantz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Does it really make a difference if you are in the area? However, Nuke would be the greatest threat.
2006-10-06 17:51:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Daddy Big Dawg 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most likely a dirty bomb.
Someone could steal nuclear waste and spread it in a populated area.
2006-10-06 17:46:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
At the moment, as far as the USA is concerned, none of them.... the ILLEGAL ALIEN INVASION and unsecured borders are the greatest TERRORIST threat to the USA.
2006-10-06 18:07:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thermonuclear apocalypse goes to:
Nuke!
2006-10-06 17:45:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by whrldpz 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Take your choice! But, as for us, we are greatful that President Bush has prevented ANY ATTACKS for FIVE Years now!!
2006-10-06 17:46:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sentinel 5
·
1⤊
1⤋