Whatever mistakes Bush I still wouldn't trust any Lib to run a war. Clinton was such a coward and I heard that he literally cried when he heard about Somalia, and he cowered when he had the chance to get Osama.
2006-10-06 14:35:05 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Mmm…so let’s see, you prefer a President who has no empathy for our troops, over a President that was supposedly moved by the deaths of some of our men? You consider staying in a war, that ultimately was faulty from the get go, and is being currently handled with sheer incompetence, as the hallmark of virtue, as opposed to an action that would end up saving American soldiers’ lives, which would otherwise be sacrificed for a situation that does not factor into the war on terror and does not thwart terrorism.
Conservatives always demonize Clinton as a coward who retreated, and elevate Bush for being “brave” enough to send other men to die in a war that is inconsequential to our security. Conservatives also claim that they are for the troops while liberals are against them. Something doesn’t add up to me. How can you be more supportive of troops when your actions cause them to die senselessly, while others can be against the troops when they endeavor to take them out of harms way as quickly as possible.
It makes we wonder whether hawkish conservatives occupy some alternate universe, where all logic is reversed; where death is life, and life is death. Either way it is a world, that I, and other sensible people, wouldn’t want to live in.
2006-10-06 14:55:20 · answer #1 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
The Libs are cut 'n runners all right. Clinton was so touchy-feely that Genifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky, among a whole host of others, got touched and felt way too often. I'll bet he actually did cry. especially when Hildabeast tightened up the vice grips on his huddyacallits when the Monica thing got thrown back in her face. After all she was just an innocent little country girl, who also happened to be the only First Lady in the history of this Country to be under criminal indictment. I heard ole Billbob was hittin' on Demi Moore recently. Do ya suppose he had it in for Austin Kutcher?
2006-10-06 21:48:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
A simple google search of political speeches and press release from the libs proves you are right. The are all for cut and run. Their main hero's are the most outspoken cut and run advocates.
2006-10-06 21:49:30 · answer #3 · answered by dwh320 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No way are libs cut and runners. They want redeployment. I looked it up in the conservative translation of the liberal dictionary and a synonym for redeployment is cut and run. How funny...
2006-10-06 21:38:26 · answer #4 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hell yeah! With their superior running ability,they should be on the Olympic track and field team,instead of in Washington screwing up the country.
2006-10-06 21:43:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
No, most liberals support fighting Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, and now we're stuck in Iraq and there is nothing we can do about it.
2006-10-06 21:48:53 · answer #6 · answered by braningillespie 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
They might Cut and Run, but no one can do it better !
2006-10-06 21:39:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
You heard of "the cowboy way"? Cut and run is "the liberal way"!
2006-10-06 21:40:36 · answer #8 · answered by Bawney 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
didn't bush "cut and run" when he had the chance to capture osama?, didn't HW Bush "cut and run" instead of going all the way to baghdad?
2006-10-06 21:39:20 · answer #9 · answered by Nick F 6 · 1⤊ 6⤋
I believe you've summed it up well. Bush has his faults, but he and most other Republicans are saints by comparison.
2006-10-06 21:38:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 4⤋