English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

songs downloaded from napster

2006-10-06 13:17:46 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet Other - Computers

3 answers

The French retailer FNAC, specialized in cultural and technological products, has just thrown a big stone in the music majors' garden by taking a trick that's well-known to the hackers and revealing it to the public: how to circumvent the copy-protection and DRM schemes on songs purchased online by burning the songs to a CD, then ripping the copied CD back to the computer into a DRM-free and portable format such as mp3. This way, one can buy a song online anywhere and listen to it on the portable device of their choice. The retailer is telling the public that they can use this trick with songs purchased on music stores including its own, and to add insult to injury, is even offering blank CDs to its clients!

2006-10-06 13:28:22 · answer #1 · answered by steamroller98439 6 · 0 0

the main reason CD's fee plenty isn't that it is expensive fabric. The disc expenses below a cent to make. this isn't any longer because of the fact of band royalties- maximum bands make their larger gross sales off of traveling..or a minimum of they used to once you had to truly flow play song outdoors of an enhancing studio to be a musician for a living.. maximum of what you're paying for is the licensing fee, the main remarkable to own those songs. in case you many times shop your receipts or in spite of in case you basically offered the songs or CD's with a mastercard you won't be able to get in difficulty for having them. no longer even in a million formats. You did no longer basically pay for the music. You paid for the main remarkable to take heed to and use the music, in a noncommercial way. What i'm guessing the guy above means by using "that form of ingredient could be complicated to tutor" is enable's say you particularly get audited or investigated. You declare you paid for the songs. they won't be able to, even without record, tutor the absence of a few thing- there could be no case. as an occasion, enable's say that watermelons are somewhat blue until you decrease them open and that i suggested you had to tutor me incorrect.. you decrease one open and that i say "oop! See? It replaced into blue a 2nd in the past." Abscense of info isn't info of guilt..and the emotional guilt you have approximately using some thing you own confuses me. except you're reselling the copies for earnings that cuts into the record agencies money, no regulation respected could care to difficulty with you. If this replaced into no longer authentic, all of us who copied songs to their iPod could be committing a federal offense.

2016-10-18 22:58:29 · answer #2 · answered by itani 4 · 0 0

You BUY the content instead of stealing it.

2006-10-06 13:25:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers