English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ie, are women [generally - hillary clinton, margaret thatcher excepted] free from mad limitless greed for money and power, and limitless ego to justify it?

would women generally have the sense to realise that extreme wealth-power and extreme poverty-powerlessness could only be very very very bad for absolutely everyone?

the matriarchal cretan empire had 3000 years of peace and plenty [according to flinders-petrie, the great archeologist of crete] - matriarchy enables sexual freedom for male and female [since the women share the burden of children] which probably prevents pentup frustrated explosive violent sexual energy

has patriarchy become decadent, destructive, insane, and will we see a global shift back to matriarchy, sense and constructiveness?

in crete everyone had multiroom homes, which was not seen in the patriarchy till 16th C

would women have the sense to see that no one can earn a billion times as much pr hr as another worker [as some men think]? - or not?

2006-10-06 12:33:50 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Economics

3 answers

IF by HSEHLD you mean Household then HOUSEHOLD & POLITICS are two seperate things and will never be even remotely close so do not compare!

My household runs smoothly and richly but I would have to run a political office differently due to the morons working under me.

Just that simple !

2006-10-07 02:30:04 · answer #1 · answered by Kitty 6 · 0 0

Um, you mean the same glorious women who suck babies' brains out with a vacuum cleaner? Spare us the bogus hoaxes that with women in charge there will be a wonderful paradise.

2006-10-06 19:43:53 · answer #2 · answered by retiredslashescaped1 5 · 1 0

civilization as we know it, is based on social and economic inequality... which is sad, but true... bands and tribes are based on egalitarianism... once groups grow to a particular size (more than afew tens of thousands) permenant institutions begin to appear, and social classes form, prestige from lineages, etc (in chiefdoms and states)...

i cant speak for all women, but I dont think its fair that some people need to suffer in order for others to flourish...

2006-10-06 19:41:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers