and when its said and done they haven't told you a thing:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Agy0icU7DkoImE4n8T_ighTsy6IX?qid=20061001151810AA3EnDI
We all know that crap is King..............who sang that?
2006-10-06 11:55:44 · 5 answers · asked by Cherie 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
ROFL-Sunshine--I clicked on one link and saw nothing but disproved lies made up by the libs---won't waste my time with the rest. Thanks for the chuckle tho!
2006-10-06 12:12:15 · update #1
davegordo--go back and read my additional details. Bush had Congressional approval. He did NOT need the UN approval. If he did, Clinton's pre-emtive attacks were "illegal" too.
2006-10-06 12:32:27 · update #2
http://www.thejackasswon.com/reasons.cfm
http://friendpages.com/p/pages/cover.cgi?pageid=reasons
http://www.irregulartimes.com/bootbush.html
http://www.525reasons.com/archives/000800.html
http://www.thousandreasons.org/
http://www.badgovernment.blogspot.com/
Those are pleanty of reasons. There they are. I know I'm going to be contradicted... I KNOW IT. Because people have been saying throughout his entire 2 terms why he's a bad president. Then you all pretend there's no reason? LOOK AT THE SITES ABOVE.
Biased? Of course, but there are pleanty of sites biased the other way. These are just reasons Anti-Bush people hate him.
If you close your mind, and don't even look at them, you're a fool. You're ignorant and should be ashamed of yourself. I showed you reasons, now you can't say no one showed you reasons, you can only whine about how you refused to look because it might actually change your mind. Or maybe you're afraid I'm right..
Or maybe you won't have your mind changed. I don't really care at all about you. I just wanted to prove you wrong. There are the reasons, now go ask another poorly structured and typed question.
2006-10-06 12:02:05 · answer #1 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ok, the war is illegal because the US overthrew the head of a completely sovergn nation that did not attack any foreign country. Also, this overthrowing of Saddam was not sanctioned by the UN. These are two ways the US violated international treaties and laws. Thus, it was illegal. What do you have to say to that? Email me if you want.
Yeah, I read your last post and you seem to be a little confused. What Clinton did with Bosnia was that he went to protect the people from being the victims of ethnic clensing. Bush, with no real intelligence (Congress didn't have it either and should also be blamed) went in to overthrow a government. The reason Bush inacted military action was that Saddam was violating UN Treaties. The UN didn't think ths, but we went ahead and carried our takeover anyways.
Basically, Bush with horrible intelligence sent troups into war. That is irresponsible and since it was under false pretenses, illegal.
2006-10-06 19:14:17 · answer #2 · answered by Existence 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think your comment in the question above has a slight error. I think they have told you something. What they have told you stinks, is gooey and nasty, and has the initials BS. Look at the first answer to your question. I REST MY CASE!!!!!
2006-10-06 19:41:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're forgetting about the lying about WMDs.
2006-10-06 19:02:56 · answer #4 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
GEORGE W. BUSH AND HIS MORAL CHOIR OF PREVERT CONGRESSMEN
2006-10-06 19:04:09 · answer #5 · answered by roy40372 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋