2006-10-06 11:29:24 · 13 answers · asked by tdamc 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Yes, Jackson is a better play 2 games vs 49ers, ST Rams, and Az. Hasselbeck is better choice than Lienart.
You can count on Jackson getting 1200 yards and 7 to 9 tds while Boldin could get 1400 yards and same amount of TD's with a top QB.
Branch isnt going to steal that many balls from Jackson, even befor Branch got there, Jackson was a Pro Bowl WR. He was hurt last year and missed most of the season. I guess people have short memories.
Dont forget a couple of weeks ago Jackson was the #1 ranked WR too. That was befor Alexander got hurt. And Alexanders Injury is more problems than adding Branch to that line up.
Forgot to mention, Az takes Boldin out on 3rd downs! WTH is with that! Boldin is a much better WR than Fitz is.
2006-10-06 13:46:04 · answer #1 · answered by Dan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I own Boldin in my league and I wouldn't trade him for Jackson. No way Boldin is younger and has better numbers than Jackson in the past. Boldin has 295 receiving yards to Jackson 293 yards this season. Last year Boldin had rec. 1402 yards while Jackson had 482 rec. yards.
CBS/Sportsline says:
Jackson is still the No. 1 guy in the eyes of Matt Hasselbeck and that won't change soon. Consider Jackson an excellent No. 2 WR option in any format for Week 6 at St. Louis after the team's bye.
Boldin had been putting up good numbers despite the Cardinals' QB struggles, but that wasn't the case Sunday. The Cardinals struggled offensively and that trickled down to everyone on the stat sheet. Regardless, Boldin remains an excellent option for Week 5 vs. Kansas City.
2006-10-06 11:52:34 · answer #2 · answered by bolddragon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say YES trade ...Jackson has more points right now. !!!! Boldin has 20 v.s. Jackson who has 32. 12 points better then Boldin...(YAHOO FANTASY FOOTBALL STATS )
The Seahawks will not cut Jackson cus of Branch .. they would get rid of Bruleson first . Jackson is there Number one..Anquan Boldin is not gonna get too many more points cus Leinart is now the Qb there and he is inexperinced in the NFL.
Hope I could help.
PS I traded Boldin for T.O. !!!!!!!!! I think I upgraded.. what you think?
2006-10-06 15:06:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not.
Boldin is healthy. Jackson is rarely healthy the last two years.
Seattle has more weapons, and spreads the ball around even more than Arizona. Boldin and Fitz seem to share the load pretty equally. In the short term, Edge may pick up a bit with short dink and dump passing on blitz pickups.
Give the Leinart kid some time to settle in. He might suprise you. Be patient.
2006-10-06 11:37:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In a word: NO!!!! There's no reason to do that. Yes, yes. I know that Arizona is putting in a rookie QB, but don't worry. I would rather have a No. 1 on Arizona than on Seattle. Seattle is filled with good receivers. Holmgren is implementing a lot of four receiver sets since the acquisition of Branch and the injury to Alexander. That means less looks to D Jack. Boldin will receive way more looks and, with his talent, will catch most of those looks. Have faith in Boldin. No reason to trade because DJack has no upside. Don' t do it.
2006-10-06 11:43:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thomas Jones won't even have the job on the top of the season. Chester is in simple terms getting started. he's had some promising first steps in Minnesota. Plaxico is puffed up, i could desire to declare, yet he's larger than Anquan. inspite of each and every thing, how are you able to evaluate a WR getting throws from Eli to getting throws from Kurt Warner in the back of Arizona's porous offensive line. Burress will replace right into a suited 10 fantasy reciever, in simple terms you wait and notice.
2016-12-13 03:28:52 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
AZ is really pissing me off. I just traded Boldin for Braylon Edwards, which I see as a solid trade. I would try and get somone else besides Jackson
2006-10-06 12:21:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES!!!!!! Matt Leinart is given the start, so he won't produce big numbers in his first couple of starts; Darrell Jackson is better because Shaun Alexander is injured, so Jackson will get the ball thrown to him a lot
2006-10-06 11:35:20 · answer #8 · answered by cubscaps33 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with answer addict the guy who answered you eirlier. Jackson won't get many passes thrown to him because of Branch. Since Leinart is starting he's going to want to prove himself so see him passing even though they still fitzgerald but it can't always be a one man show. definately don't trade boldin to get jackson.
2006-10-06 13:17:41 · answer #9 · answered by dylanbre917 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell no! Jackson will probably be cut soon because the Seahawks are packed with other great receivers, and Boldin's having another solid year.
2006-10-06 11:34:09 · answer #10 · answered by FootballFan1012 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋