Because they want Foley to become a NAMBLA member.
2006-10-06 10:56:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by me 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Answer one: the same reason your guys were so obsessed with Clinton, it makes your party look better.
Answer two: if someone is saying beware of pedophiles, it means they are trying to protect someone. No obsession, just caring for others. Would you prefer if he was given a bye for being Conservative?
Answer three: NAMBLA, the North American Man/Boy Love Association. Have you thought that maybe what party someone is doesn't influence what they support. Ok, I don't support gun laws and illegal immigration. Does that make me a Conservative? But that's impossible, I don't worship Bush and agree to killing innocent people (the court of law isn't 100% accurate, which means there are innocents on death row).
2006-10-07 08:55:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Huey Freeman 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Democrats think Foley is their ticket to victory in November. Funny thing is few of them mention the young people that were alleged to have been affected by him. As far as NAMBLA is concerned, Nancy P. Minority leader in the House has a 90% approval rate with the ALCU whose attorneys defended NAMBLA in a case not long ago. If Democrats are so concerned about the welfare of children they might want to look into where she is getting or giving her support.
2006-10-06 12:53:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
To answer questions one and two: because as a rival party, we (Reps and Dems) find it necessary to flaunt every wrong thing or fallibility that happens to the other party. And to answer question numero tres: I think that NAMBLA is a sick organization (almost as sick as the American Nazzys and the KKK, featuring members of both, most likely) that should be broken up, with all members tried and held at Guantanamo Bay to be tortured and beaten!
2006-10-06 20:30:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Man of Steel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know....let's refer to some of your prior posts:
-Is Foley going to be getting Clinton's support soon?
-"It's OK to be a pedophile", Why do Liberals think this?
-Why are Liberals so obsessed with the Foley case?
-Liberals, what about the 16 yr old in the Foley case?
-Can you dumb Liberals show me ONE person who is defending Foley?
-Why do Liberals support pedophiles?
If you haven't gotten your answers by now, you're not going to. Clearly someone is obsessed with Foley and pedophilia, and it's not Liberals.
2006-10-06 11:03:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Oh, Okay, so were supposed to sit back and let John Mark Karr and Foley talk to our kids online. Makes Perfect sense to you conservatives. Paint a rosy picture on a dead body. You do it in Iraq, and now you're doing it with the pedophiles.
2006-10-06 11:02:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by FootballFan1012 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
Why are you wasting points asking questions about Foley, if it is obsessive to do so?
Any idea when you will stop defending him?
2006-10-06 11:01:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by hichefheidi 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
I guess LIBS are not so different from cons after all. LIBS are obsessed with Foley and CONS are STILL obsessed with Clinton.
2006-10-06 11:00:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by politicallypuzzeled 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Ah Hah, you can count me as one who is definately NOT .
Maybe it's the practical "conservative" part coming out of my "conservative-liberalism"...
2006-10-07 11:56:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the same reason that conservatives were so obsessed with Monica Lewinski.
2006-10-06 10:58:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by bb80266 3
·
2⤊
2⤋