I think it was tacky & disrespectful to him...
2006-10-06 09:21:09 · 17 answers · asked by Weeber 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
The marrage isn't leagel, so it can't be to protect her daughter. The lady is doing it all for attention. Every thing she does is for attention. I bet she is grateful for being put back in the spotlight.
2006-10-06 09:36:05 · answer #1 · answered by dumbblond 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm not sure. A marriage takes a long time to plan, so it was probably already far into the works when all of a sudden her son died. Money had already been paid to everyone necessary for a wedding probably (like a caterer, DJ, etc.), and weddings (especially celebrity weddings) cost a lot. And canceling usually means you don't get back a deposit, so it may have been necessary if only so that the money isn't wasted and have to be respent.
She is however a rich celebrity, loss of money may not (and probably doesn't) mean as much to her as to one of us. Nevertheless, nobody likes to just waste money for nothing at all, especially when it will be necessary to spend it again later (after the son has been sufficiently grieved for). I think in the end, it was just practicality that forced the issue, however; not any disrespect for the son.
2006-10-06 09:33:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Have you had a son die, noooo. Why should people be so harsh to judge a woman who just lost her child! Let the poor woman have a bit of happiness! Stars are people and have feelings too, that is so sad what happened and she may not be thinking clearly as normal. Daniel most likely wanted his mom to marry him. Daniel would only want his mother to be happy as soon as possible. If you died would you want your mother sad or to move on and be happy? Anna new her son very well and would not disrespect him. She even had the autopsy repeated when she did not have to. So, no I do not think it inappropriate, tacky or disrespectful but it was most likely in the works before this happened. I think it is ignorant for people who do not personally know her to judge her and noones business anyway. She has more creative ways to draw attention to herself, she probably feels this is the right thing for her daughter and her.
2006-10-06 09:32:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know I though that was weird too, she married the lawyers only 2 weeks after her son died. I am sure that this is not the end of it, we will hear more. At first I felt bad for her but now, I dont know what to think of her even if it wasnt a legal wedding she should of waited for respect for her dead son, I read that while she was partiyng and getting her little ceremony her son was still in the morgue and the mortician said " she still hasnt called me to make funeral arragements to bury daniel" that is pretty tacky of her!
2006-10-07 01:21:25 · answer #4 · answered by Queen Kitty 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wow, give this woman a freakin' break..
She was obviously devastated because she lost her son..one of the only things in her life that was perfect. Why would she want him to die?
Her having the wedding is the one day where she was probably real happy. no I don't think it was wrong, because for the past month shes been mourning the death of her son.
Losing my mom tragically, I can say that doing something that makes you happy even a week after the death, is something that is needed. You cant mourn forever or you'll be hurting yourself. Anyone will tell you that.
2006-10-06 16:35:45 · answer #5 · answered by Swifttibbby 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anna Nicole Smith's estranged mom Virgie Arthur is a fat, funds-grubbin', undesirable excuse for a mom. anybody's interest in Anna -- different than Larry Birkhead -- is financially based. Whoever is ultimately on top of problems with Smith's female offspring, Dannielynn, additionally controls in spite of money she had on the time of her demise. in addition they administration any potential award in accordance along with her unsettled case on the subject remember of billionaire J. Howard Marshall II's assets. the end results of Anna Nicole's lawsuit over her husband's fortune hangs in the soundness as does the quantity of funds she, and ultimately Dannielynn, are entitled to inherit. Is it the $8 million her husband gave her, or the $474 million the financial ruin court docket gave her, or the $88 million the federal court docket gave her? Regardless, Vergie Arthur replace into out of Anna's existence for surely the final 10 years. I call her surfacing and desiring custody of Anna's physique hinkey previous all theory. enable's no longer forget that Anna's way of existence and antics talk to how properly Vergie fulfilled her function as mom while Anna replace into alive. She's of course appearing out of guilt -- blended with a want for a lot of eco-friendly.
2016-12-08 09:41:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that she had to because people were not buying that her lawyer is the father of her new daughter and she is having him pose as such so that she can keep the baby from the other guy (sorry, I don't know his name) that she was dating at the time of conception to keep him out of her life. Now he's sued for DNA though.
2006-10-06 09:48:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing should surprise you about that woman. Come on now she married some 90+ year old man when she was like 25 that's crazy enough. She obviously had something to do with his death and is trying to cover her as$ your husband can not testify against you in a court of law.
2006-10-06 09:29:14 · answer #8 · answered by Trish H 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think that pretty much everything Anna Nicole Smith does is inappropriate. Can't stand the b****.
2006-10-06 09:27:57 · answer #9 · answered by PRS 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Very - tacky, tasteless, and unrespectful towards her late son.
But then again, whatelse would anyone expect out of her - she's made a career doing exactly that.
2006-10-06 09:30:15 · answer #10 · answered by B C 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋