Ideally, how do you think science should be taught?

Question

And how far away are we from YOUR dream?

Answer 1

First scientific thinking should be cultivated before teaching any scientific concepts. As the human language is grossly inadequate to convey the real meaning, it all depends upon the teacher. But again the system is not capable of identifying the good teacher.

For example, if we just accept newton's 3rd law "For each and every action there is an equal and opposite reaction", then every action gets nullified and the universe should have frozen. Nothing should work. The real meaning is different from what is written on a paper.

Best lectures and presentations should be taught and discussed through the educational media network to reach the masses.

Answer 2

Scientifically

Answer 3

Hands on...kids like trying things themselves, when possible...In science class, teach accepted scientific principles. Religious instruction is for teaching people how their own religion views things, not a science class.

Answer 4

By scientists rather than religious interests, for one.

"Creationism" under any guise (including so-called "Intelligent Design") no more belongs in the science textbooks than Wright's coefficient of relationship belongs in the Lord's Prayer.

Answer 5

giving it no importance but facing its futility through history, so students do see it in the face and nobody acquires the stupid selfimportance no one likes or approves. Science is to be the effimerous gift of nature to nonatachment, because there is no room actually in education for fads or sorrows, meaning there is no math in lies.

Answer 6

hahaha we have another comdeian on Y!A. Great

Answer 7

IN THIS ERA OF SCIENCE -EDUCATION OF SCIENCE I PRIMARILY PRIORITY

Answer 8

PRACTICALS, VOCATIONAL TRANING, AND REAL FACTUAL
EXPERIENCE ON THE FIELDS.