Whats the deal with Republican Speakers of the House and ethics? First Gingrich resigns for being a weasel?

Question

NOW Dennis Hastert is looking bad.

Maybe the Plutocrat Reds-staters should stick to being president and leave the house to Americans.

I figure the President is the most usless job in Washington DC

The guys fixing pot holes have a better job.

Answer 1

They cant even be presidential.

Giving them too much credit.

Answer 2

Gingrich resigned simply by fact he had lost "administration" of the GOP caucus. He grew to alter right into a polarizing parent under an extremely universal president (Clinton) and alter right into a political criminal duty to the GOP The ethics costs have been brushed off on the time Gingrich resigned. He replace into in no way formally sanctioned by skill of the domicile nor did he commit any crimes.

Answer 3

Remember the crook, Jim Wright?
Many Democrat House members either were forced to resigned in shame, or went to jail.
The ethics have really improved under Republican control.

Answer 4

The Republican Speakers and ethics are two entities that do no co-exist in your question or in real life--that's the deal. This last week of watching these morons shoot themselves in the foot on t.v. is truly disturbing to me and hopefully everyone else that has a mainstream thought in their head!!

Answer 5

Since when do anti-Republicans care about ethics?

I've yet to see anything resembling ethics (or morals) from a Democrat politician. If you support unethical and immoral behavior from Democrats, why are you being so hypocritical in demanding it from others?

Answer 6

Think about this for a minute.












That empty space is what resides in the minds of Republican sheep, that's why they support the GOP.

Answer 7

Your question should have been "What's the deal with Repulicans and ethics?"

Answer 8

Good point..