First thing they did when Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was killed was spread some garbage about US soldiers torturing him..... That turned out to be false... But it does show where their loyalty lies and its not with President Bush so the answer is undeniably ..... Terrorist..
2006-10-06 08:00:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by bereal1 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Bush by no potential served. He joined the Air nationwide shelter and went AWOL. He did no longer save any American risk-free, he skipped over a written intelligence briefing warning a pair of achieveable plane hijacking and did no longer something. It develop into in easy terms after 9/11 thart he certainly did something - after a around of golf. He skipped over UN weapons inspectors besides because of the fact the yank inspectors who informed him to attend until eventually it ought to be desperate whether or no longer Saddam certainly had them. He skipped over an Iraqi who had supervised the destruction of the WMDs that Saddam certainly had. while US troops certainly did enter Baghdad, there have been no risk-free practices measures taken, and all hell broke loose. government workplaces have been looted with impunity. helpful artifacts have been stolen from the Iraq Museum. the only government employer that develop into guarded by potential of US troops develop into the Iraqi OIL MINISTRY; which components any thinking individual a good clue what the objectives of the Bushies have been. The record of examples of Bush incompetence and bungling is going on and on. examine your recent background; records's all over the internet. do a sprint analyze with an open techniques, and you will see what a catastrophe George W Bush and "Dick" Cheney truly have been for the US and its allies.
2016-10-02 00:28:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the liberals hate president bush so much but insist on leaving the poor terrorists alone and for our military to stop fighting...well heres an idea....How about you liberals go to Iraq or better yet, Afghanistan, and try to speak nicely to a terrorist and tell him you dont believe in the war.........You wouldnt make it 2 seconds! They would shoot you or cut your damn head off! So shut the hell up with your bitching and moaning!
2006-10-06 07:48:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by maggi r 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Why do conservatist think all liberals are against fighting terrorism?
Just because a large amount of liberals, as well as conservatist are against the war in Iraq, doesn't mean we are against fighting terrorism.
I love america because of freedom of speech, so I can tell you how stupid your question is. Grow up.
2006-10-06 07:58:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mimi 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I agree with Nick F.
2006-10-06 07:59:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
zzzzzzzzzzzz
are you all of 14?
2006-10-06 07:56:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
terrorists and George bush equally, as they are the same
2006-10-06 07:55:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Nick F 6
·
1⤊
3⤋
Mimi, what is a "conservatist"?
2006-10-06 08:02:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by rustyshackleford001 5
·
1⤊
0⤋