2006-10-06
07:15:45
·
21 answers
·
asked by
dan_in_la
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
Ok Republicans, are you saying Bill Clinton was a good president? The question is how can we improve our election process, i.e. scratch the electoral college, campaign reform, improve the nomination process, there has to be a better way?
2006-10-06
10:54:27 ·
update #1
I have voted in every general election and most primaries since I turned 18 for Republicans, Democrats, Greens and Libertarians.
2006-10-06
10:57:22 ·
update #2
President Bush is evidence that our VOTERS are deeply flawed.
The Electoral College was designed to give smaller states a slightly bigger say in the entire election process. It still does that, but there are so many states now that the effect is diluted.
You really should read the Constitution, because according to the Constitution, we don't have to have Presidential elections at all.
"Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress...The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President."
So you see, the fact that we vote for President and Vice-President is only because that's how all the states have decided to implement the selection of Electors. Most states give all their electors to whoever won the state. There are a couple that divide their electors up by percentage of the popular vote. If ALL states did that, Gore would have won in 2000.
But it's not up to the national government. It's up to EACH STATE to decide how they will select their electors. The reason that most give all electors to the winner is simple. If you're a Blue state, chances are your state government is also Democrat-dominated, and they are NOT going to give ANY PORTION of their electors to the GOP. The opposite it also true. The party in power is not going to voluntarily give any electors to the other party.
Sad, though. That is why we have five battleground states in each pesidential election and the rest of the country hardly matters. If the candidates had to fight for every electoral vote, it would be a much broader, much more fair campaign.
2006-10-06 08:17:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chredon 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
The voting system can be improved in lots of ways the 1st way of course would be to do away with the electoral college that was a joke put in by Ben Franklin anyway he never thought anyone would take it serious. then make it so if you use an electronic voting machine there is a paper trail to show you that your vote actually counted, check everyone that shows up at the polls to vote give them a voters ID that way it stops the dead voting and the people that can not vote legally from being counted,and most of all do not allow the Supreme Court to choose your president, just think 9 men chose George W. Bush in 2000. If a mess like that in Florida re-occurs then you simply redo the entire election in that one state and not recount votes you do a re-vote. Those are but a few improvements I do think that if one would sit down and think there could be many more.
2006-10-06 15:36:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by billc4u 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
President George W. Bush is proof that lies and media bias cant ruin the electoral process in the US. If you watched the news before the elections all the mainstream stations were just reporting on by how much Bush would loose to Kerry. Bush is the perfect example of this quote: "what is popular isnt always right and what is right isnt always popular"
2006-10-06 07:20:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by baberuth724 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Reform American politics by making our country a true democracy instead of a republic. The technology now exists to allow a popular vote to be counted instantaneously.
___________________________________________________
Check out the new blog: BUSHWACKER!
www.blogger.com
http://al-aback.blogspot.com
___________________________________________________
The electoral college is nothing more than a crooked political sham anymore. In its early days, it made sense. Today it is a scandalous miscarriage of our election procedure dominated by Democrats and Republicans who covet control and power over the needs and benefit of the nation.
First, we must eliminate ALL 535 members of the most corrupt, incompetent, contemptible, evil, arrogant U.S. Congress ever to occupy the Capitol Building, as well as the current greedy, evil administration. The U.S. Constitution gives us the right to bear arms against a tyrannical and oppressive government, and the need for another American Revolution is way past due! -RKO-
2006-10-06 08:48:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
they're nevertheless speaking about Abraham Lincoln, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Harry Truman and Lyndon B. Johnson, and their conflict archives, so i visit't see that there'll ever be an election twelve months without the Bush's being suggested. they're component to historic previous now, for extra perfect or for worse. through ways that's a remarkable image of you.
2016-12-04 08:23:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by deparvine 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Electoral College is an ancient system. It doesn't work anymore. Presidential elections should be based on a popular vote.
2006-10-06 07:24:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gene Rocks! 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Oh yeah, and GeneJohn is SOOO right. That icky old constitution is SOOO ancient, we should just tear it up and start over. Maybe JayZee and Snoop can rite it awl in sum sorta hiphop afringlish so dat u cn unnerstnd it n it rel8s 2 u.
2006-10-06 07:35:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by newbie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just because your candidate lost does not mean the system is flawed.... bush got far more votes then clinton who only was elected because of ross perot
2006-10-06 11:02:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ron H 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
It'll only improve when EVERY registered voter gets out there and VOTES! And, as long as we can have a free media.
2006-10-06 07:25:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
To come up with an honest answer, you will have to research what is wrong, and what is right, with the system. If you can only throw rocks at it, you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.
2006-10-06 07:19:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Rjmail 5
·
1⤊
0⤋