English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the question was .. If Foley were a democrat would he still be in office..

this was an answer
"yes. There are plenty of examples of the demonrats doing the same exact thing & they're still in office. They're always saying "keep your personal life personal" when it comes to the things they do. They're hipocrates."

so now all you righters.. give examples.. no false and slanderous BS answers but true examples.
Remember these people will still have to be in office post the "event"...
go for it.

2006-10-06 06:59:26 · 9 answers · asked by hardartsystems 3 in Politics & Government Politics

come on Ruth..I need examples ? .. please. try to defend this imbicilic comment

2006-10-06 07:05:46 · update #1

oop.. my mistake ,, liable, thanks

2006-10-06 07:07:23 · update #2

9 answers

I think it could go either way. Depending on who was buying who lunch.

They are all a bunch of slimy perverts.

I like using Abraham Lincoln as a Gold Standard. He contracted Syphilis from a prostitute while in office. That brought on his homosexual relationship with that Captain Smith guy.

As a good husband and president he no longer slept with his wife. But when you consider his Homo-sex. It may not have been consensual. He simply inquired of the General Staff who was gay and gave Smith the job as military liaison.

This is sexual indiscretion at it's highest.



Go big Red Go

2006-10-06 07:50:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You'll get an answer to your question, but not from me...

You'll see no defense of Foley from me...

You'll see how effective this new platform is come November...

Good luck. And it's libel, not liable...

Examples of what? Show me an example of where I said any of the statements you have quoted here. I have said and I will continually say that at least Foley resigned.

2006-10-06 14:03:34 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

still too much of the blame game. It is wrong for both sides and to dwell on somebodys wrong actions is even worse. Clinton this and Foley that is getting real old real fast

2006-10-06 14:09:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I'm a republican, and I never would have said something like that.

I don't care if Foley is a democrat, a republican, or the mayor of toon town. He should be impeached, fired, berated, drug out into the street, and shot.

2006-10-06 14:05:06 · answer #4 · answered by trigam41 4 · 2 0

Okay:

http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newjersey/ny-bc-nj--embattledbryant1005oct05,0,7803569.story?coll=ny-region-apnewjersey

2006-10-06 14:24:34 · answer #5 · answered by Cherie 6 · 0 0

One cannot realise socialism with lazy, frivolous, egoistic, thoughtless and indifferent human beings. A socialist society needs human beings from whom each one in his place, is full of passion and enthusiasm for the general well-being, full of self-sacrifice and sympathy for his fellow human beings, full of courage and tenacity in order to dare to attempt the most difficult.

2006-10-06 14:08:06 · answer #6 · answered by ? 2 · 1 2

AW, the games people play--old quote from Cesar's time--"start with the lawyers and hanging them all."

2006-10-06 14:04:31 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 0 1

Cons depend on slander to accomodate their base, otherwise they have nothing.

2006-10-06 14:06:01 · answer #8 · answered by Kookoo Bananas 1 · 0 2

You are wrong.

Slander is spoken, if it is in writing, it is libel, not slander.

2006-10-06 14:05:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers