2006-10-06 05:49:59 · 16 answers · asked by playtoofast 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No, he is a loser for going to war there in the first place when they had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks and were no threat to us whatsoever.
2006-10-06 05:53:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
No, being the number one superpower is a responsibility, and the game isn't over yet. George Bush may not be the brightest bulb in the box, but at least he takes responsibility. There is a very effective American force in the area and the Muslim Middle East countries will play nice with each other instead of having war after war with each other as they have for thousands of years.
2006-10-06 12:57:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
We won the war in Iraq a long time ago. What army or government are we're fighting there? We're working on the peace now. Hey, it took 100 years to win the peace in the south after the war between the states.
2006-10-06 13:01:05 · answer #3 · answered by Slow Poke 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Bush is not only a loser , he is a IIdickheadII
I hate him sooooo much and there are no words to describe his dirtiness
2006-10-06 12:58:08 · answer #4 · answered by hard to get 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hey generallo, won the war a long time ago? Is that why Iraq is practically in a civil war and we continue to lose soldiers daily ? What in the world are you smoking?
2006-10-06 13:04:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
It is difficult to say whether he is personally a loser or if it amounts to a defeat of the war on terror!
2006-10-06 12:53:35 · answer #6 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He is just a loser in general!
2006-10-06 12:58:47 · answer #7 · answered by supercat 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
wow did you even realize that northern iraq is totally free and functioning?there government is in place and is prospering? the schools are open and full of girls too? and most of sothern iraq is comming back also..be specific about the cities you are talking about .. did you mean bahgdad? where the idiots are killing innocent people under the name of islam? please restate your questions with specific information to come up with a informative answer..
2006-10-06 12:57:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
What lib site says that? Where is the proof?
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Sep2003/n09232003_200309238.html
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Aug2005/20050827_2551.html
2006-10-06 13:02:04 · answer #9 · answered by Jean R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah he is a loser for that and a lot of other stuff.
Silly neocons defend their mistakes more than they defend their successes, thats why the act like blind lemming
2006-10-06 12:55:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋