Woodwards book indicates RICE lied about not being told of an attack on the USA AS someone said just before She clearly told the 9/11 Commission that she was warned by a memo titled "Bin Laden Determined to Attack inside the United States" : she decided at the time that the memo was a "historical document" despite it detailing recent evidence for the claim. That was in 2004. Also, Richard Clarke's book addressed this issue previously. so did they want an attack and if so why is no one doing anything about that act of treason
2006-10-06 04:29:21 · 16 answers · asked by ANN 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Why are you asking if Bush did...you should be asking if rice or Clarke did.
and of course not! thats crazy talk
2006-10-06 04:31:45 · answer #1 · answered by k-mac 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, President Bush did not want an attack on the USA, he does not want an attack on the USA, and I believe he will never want an attack on the USA. As for the books, well, Richard Clarke has made some money off his and one can only assume Bob Woodward will do the same, 'nuff said.
2006-10-06 14:05:04 · answer #2 · answered by clwkcmo 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
First of all, disregard anything you read in Richard Clarke's book. He was subsequently exposed for the liar that he is, and rarely shows his face around Washington anymore as a result.
The fact that you're even pondering the notion that Bush would want an attack on the USA tells me that you are not really looking for a rational discussion. Perhaps you should ask Nancy Pelosi to put you on her mailing list, so the two of you can exchange conspiracy theories.
2006-10-06 11:40:31 · answer #3 · answered by The Truth Hurts! Ouch! 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The New American Century documents did discuss the need for an attack on USA. The twin towers were not specifically mentioned though
2006-10-06 11:39:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They didn't want a attack,
about Treason why did Clinton not fund the white house after the electiona and also why did his staff validalize the white b4 they left talk about Treason,
Plus the coup attempt in 2000,
See your insane seek help.
2006-10-06 11:38:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I applaud anyone who actually looks at factual information about this event, or even anyone that has questions about it. There's lots of conflicting info out there, but at the same time there's lots of fears about what may be found. I say, think and feel for yourself.
Those who speak up with questions, because they are confused, have been ridiculed. It does not make you wrong to ask. Asking keeps us from becoming sheep.
Sheep mentality is encouraged, and my own question is "why?".
2006-10-06 12:12:55 · answer #6 · answered by Rozz 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why? Look buddy, so he could discrediot Islam and clean up in the oil nations. Thats why, read Michael Myers books and find the truth.
2006-10-06 12:04:18 · answer #7 · answered by jimmyfish 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the CIA gathered the evidence on which we went to war..if you want to blame anyone blame the CIA..as far as the attacks on 911 no one knew when they were going to happen...our government gets threats every day...which ones do we act on..the CIA and FBI were not communicating with each other .if they did communicate with each who knows there might have been 3000 people alive today..
2006-10-06 11:41:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The current administration needed a "catalyst" cause to begin their program of World Domination. 9/11 fell into their lap.
2006-10-06 11:38:42 · answer #9 · answered by Jcontrols 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This website is proof that the moon landing was faked. It is on the Internet and books were written about it. It must be true.
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html
.
2006-10-06 11:41:33 · answer #10 · answered by Zak 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋