Ticketed for entering a cross walk when occupied?

Question

I would like to know if anyone has an opinion as to wheter or not this ticket was justified. Here is the situation.

I live in Texas, I was at an intersection in front of a school, I stopped behind the crosswalk, I started to move forward and then noticed a car coming so I stopped, at this point I was partially in the crosswalk, a child came along and crossed in front of me, I was pulled over and ticketed for "entering a crosswalk when occupied" the way I see it is that the child entered the crosswalk after I occupied it. Was I wrong?

Answer 1

I would fight that ticket in court, those texan cops seem really bored!The cop has to show up to defend the ticket and they usually dont, so it will be tossed out.

Answer 2

maximum persons in u . s . are not conscious that doing issues like spitting on the sidewalk, littering, and jay-strolling are considered misdemeanors in u . s ., as properly as different places like Canada. that's efficient to first understand the version between a misdemeanor and a legal. the two are considered unlawful and against the known public sturdy. the genuine difference is that a police officer or place of work of the peace does no longer could write you a value ticket or arrest you for committing a misdemeanor. A police officer, besides the undeniable fact that, can lose his job if he does no longer respond once you devote a legal. nonetheless, police are in a position to offer tickets for jay-strolling everywhere in u . s . - they only nromally do no longer difficulty.

Answer 3

Technically, you're not supposed to stop in a cross walk. Unfortunate situation and I'll bet the judge would see it your way but, the cop was correct in his assessment.

Answer 4

two thought school zone and pedestrians you will not win if you fight it

Answer 5

maybe you'll go to jail and can get a new butt buddy