Would you fight back? Just because the leader of the country is a dictator, what fault is that of the citizenship? England called us rebels and terrorist during our revolution, so what makes us different from the innocent Iraqi citizens?
2006-10-06
03:31:33
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Sticky
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
And also, how do we know that they want our help? Based on what the Bush administration says!?
I'm sure if someone actually pulled a poll, they would say GET OUT AND STOP KILLING OUR WIVES AND CHILDREN!
2006-10-06
03:43:59 ·
update #1
Oops. I stuck this in Laws and Ethics.
2006-10-06
03:47:03 ·
update #2
Ask any Native American
2006-10-06 03:39:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
If someone came here and attempted that we would probably be banding into groups of what would be termed by them terrorist and strike back at them any way that we could. We would make life as miserable for them as possible and of course we would use guerrilla tactics on them and then disappear into the population, the occupation would not go well, so to people that use logic for reason and do not follow blindly where led we are not any different from the Iraqi citizens.
2006-10-06 03:39:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by billc4u 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
The U.S. entered Iraq to free the people from Saddam Hussein.He was a mass murderer and a threat to the world. Hey, he attacked Kuwait in 1990.
"England called us rebels and terrorists during our revolution". So? Our fathers wanted their rights, but the king at that time was stubborn and too autocratic on the Americas.He was a dictator in the American people.
2006-10-06 03:51:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I agree with kent--shak---We need to get our cans home and i've always questioned the validity of killing of the innocents---Our philsosply is " WE MAY NOT ALWAYS BE RIGHT BUT WE ARE NEVER WRONG" what a crock !!! Wakeup America you are just a new kid on the block,just out of school and think you have all the answers !!! I'm an American and i have a right to say this !!
2006-10-06 04:11:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In Canada we can't do anything the police defends immigrants even if there wrong. I almost went to jail for telling some migrant not t o disrespect us. Now if I had my way I'd tell the middle east stop killing each other sit down and negotiate or we will send every B-52 bomber and all Apache attack helicopters and just carpet bomb Afghan Then I would send attack helicopters with infra red detectors for anything surviving. There's been to much wars since the time of JESUS for peace now.
Anyways we'd been doing them a favor of ending there misery and us by not sending money and troops to die trying to keep peace.
2006-10-06 03:46:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Thanks for your point Sticky. I am afraid however, that you won't find that many people sharing your views. They want war and they want to nuke the whole Middle-East, except Israel of course.
Same for the war in Lebanon - two parties fight each other on the territory of an innocent people who gets killed and bombed, tens of thousands of cluster bombs as a decoration. It seems the world is ready for war once more, as if we didn't learn from WWI and WWII.
2006-10-06 03:37:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by peterklaus13 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
1. Would you put Saddam Hussein back in power? Seriously - if we were wrong to step in an remove him from power, then the only correct thing to do is to put the situation back the way it was before we went in.
2. The violence over there is vastly Sunni-vs-Shiite, not American on Muslim. I'm not saying American Troops are pure as the driven snow, but these bombings and attacks are muslim-on-muslim.
3. We didn't draft their constitution. They did. We didn't participate in the elections really, they did it all themselves.
4. So in the end, what we did was to remove one person who was imposing his will on them - one person who WE put in power, and released the Iraqis to write their own consititution and conduct their own elections.
So how are we imposing our will?
2006-10-06 03:39:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by itsnotarealname 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
confident I agree. The illegals invasion. no rely how many cases you define criminal vs unlawful extraterrestrial beings, Democrats in Congress pass into their socialist spiel approximately human rights, jobs individuals won't do and all the different claptrap. after all, they desire those votes from illegals balloting. If one listens, I recommend truly listens to the garbage out of the mouths of "liberal" Democrats approximately illegals, all of it boils all the way down to endorsing and helpful foreigners who smuggle themselves into our united states, committing a criminal act contained in the technique. that's what Democrats in Congress desire to reward proper alongside with the RINOs serving in that corrupt physique of lawbreakers. If individuals who belong to the Democratic social gathering could in basic terms make the difficulty to understand the money path, how the culmination of their hard artwork is being stolen and exceeded over to the international banking cartel, they could boot out each Democrat in Congress and replace them with constitutionalists and actual statesmen.
2016-10-02 00:18:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by lavinia 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow.. another free thinker. Please come along to the Politics section. We need you.
The facts are there so clearly to be seen that you can only laugh at the dis-ingenuity of the NEOCONs.
Kudos to Gary F.. He's got it right.
2006-10-06 03:41:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Con-jobs with all the answers make it clear cut: It's only wrong when someone else does it.
2006-10-06 03:34:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
What would I do? I'd wonder how the heck my fellow citizens sat still for this cretin's takeover, and I'd begin hurting them and the cretin - hurting 'em real, real bad!
2006-10-06 03:34:54
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋