Marques Colston vs. Mushin Muhammad and LJ Smith
2006-10-06 02:42:26 · 6 answers · asked by JonFugeEverybody! 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Here's the thing - yahoo lets me start Colston at WR or TE
2006-10-06 02:52:35 · update #1
Your questions is actually a tricky one since Colston can play TE. (Awesome option BTW)
M Colston wins out vs. LJ Smith in the TE slot. Colston should average 75ish yards per game with better than a 50/50 chance of getting you a TD. Smith will do fine, but will top out at 50ish yards and maybe a TD once every 3 games. Colston is a huge upgrade in the TE slot - probably better than Gates at this point.
Do you have starting WR's that are as good or better than Muhammad? If you have a great WR to plug into your vacant slot, then I would take the Colston deal.
TWO THINGS TO REMEMBER:
1. It is always better to upgrade your starters than to keep good players sitting on your bench. Sure, you love your bench team but they are not scoring you any points.
2. Even in deep leagues you can always find "B" grade WR's in good matchup situations to play each week. (ie Reggie Williams this week with Matt Jones out on injury.) These players often have better scoring potential in these situations than the B+/A- players like Muhammad. Just pick them up off the waiver wire and toss them away when you are done.
2006-10-06 03:33:46 · answer #1 · answered by El Queso Grande 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The person getting Muhammad and Smith.
If you compare the numbers between Colston and Muhammad, they're pretty much synonymous (336 to 324 in yards and 3 to 1 in TD). Muhammad will still put up major numbers with Grossman at the helm. Smith is the 3rd rated TE in the league (3rd most rec. yards of TE) and a go-to guy in PHI.
It's a no brainer, Muhammad and Smith is the better of this deal.
2006-10-06 02:47:09 · answer #2 · answered by JSAM 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i guess the question mark will be McFadden. Cutler is a question mark now that he's been clinically determined with Diabetes. he would tire better regularly. Gore is an outstanding operating again. turner is an unknown commodity. became tremendous in San Diego as a third down and modify of %. again. only time will tell if he's decrease out for the each DOWN again. on the different aspect. Romo is an outstanding youthful quarterback. Welker had an outstanding 12 months, yet, did not make it happen contained in the tremendous Bowl. became this very last 12 months a fluke? it really is the authentic question. i imagine I agree that aspect B receives the nod.
2016-11-26 20:53:53 · answer #3 · answered by turick 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mush and lj smith definitely, grossman looks like a new man this year, chicago has an offense and that is dangerous for any team, and look at the numbers that onovan has been putting up, since stallworth might not play this week due to hamstring look for lj to get more looks.....
2006-10-06 02:46:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Moose becsuse he's definitley gonna have a great year.
2006-10-06 03:22:35 · answer #5 · answered by D-MAN 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mm and lj only because they are two studs to one...
2006-10-06 03:31:37 · answer #6 · answered by BarryDazzle 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋